Top 15 Vervoe Alternatives and Competitors in 2026

Skills assessment tools play a crucial role in modern hiring, helping HR and TA teams move beyond resumes to evaluate real-world skills. However, platforms such as Vervoe have not evolved to meet the needs of different hiring teams. This has prompted recruiters to explore  Vervoe alternatives such as Testlify, Predictive Index, HireVue and Codility.

While Vervoe is known for its AI-powered job simulations, many organizations find it limiting in areas such as test depth, role-specific customization, and advanced proctoring controls. As hiring becomes more competitive and high-stakes, these gaps become harder to ignore.

With that said, in this blog post, we’ll explore the Top 15 Vervoe Alternatives, comparing their features, G2 ratings, and pricing to help you identify the best skills assessment tool for your recruitment needs.

Summarise this post with:

Why companies no longer prefer Vervoe

While Vervoe still delivers solid screening capabilities, these recurring pain points are leading companies to explore Vervoe alternatives that better match their evolving hiring needs.

• Assessment setup complexity: Although Vervoe offers AI-driven assessments, many teams find that building truly tailored tests requires more manual configuration and expertise than expected, making it harder for smaller teams to get started efficiently.
• Template limitations: Users report that while there is a range of templates, role-specific and customizable test libraries can feel insufficient, forcing recruiters to spend extra time building assessments from scratch.
• Pricing vs. value for volume hiring: For companies with high candidate volumes, the cost per assessment can add up quickly without proportional return in capabilities compared with other platforms.

As you can see, Vervoe has its fair share of limitations; however, there are better alternatives in the market. Let’s quickly take a look at some of the best Vervoe alternatives that will better suit your needs. Here’s a quick comparison:

1. Testlify

Testlify is a leading AI-powered skills assessment and interviewing platform that offers 3,500+ role-specific tests in 8+ languages, enabling organizations to identify top talent worldwide. The platform also includes over 20 advanced proctoring measures, such as AI-assistance detection and dual-camera proctoring to ensure assessment integrity.

This makes it an ideal solution for both startups and enterprises that are seeking a scalable and flexible platform to support global hiring needs.

Features

• Test library: Over 3,500 pre-built tests covering technical, cognitive, and soft skills. Custom tests can also be created to fit specific roles.
• Custom question formats: Supports 25+ question types ranging from standard MCQs and essay responses to innovative video AI and voice AI interviewing formats.
• Conversational AI interviews: Leverages conversational AI interviewers to simulate on-the-job scenarios across chat, voice, and video formats to provide a realistic, engaging candidate experience.
• Psychometric assessments: Supports a wide range of psychometric tests to measure personality traits, behavioral tendencies, and cognitive abilities to help identify culturally aligned and high-potential candidates
• AI insights: Automatically generate concise summaries of candidates’ performance, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.
• Extensive ATS integrations: Supports 100+ ATS integrations out of the box to streamline recruitment workflows.
• Anti-cheating & proctoring: Leverages 18+ anti-cheating and proctoring measures such as dual-camera proctoring, AI assistance detection, live video proctoring, and more to ensure test integrity

Anti-cheating & proctoring: Leverages 18+ anti-cheating and proctoring measures such as dual-camera proctoring, AI assistance detection, live video proctoring, and more to ensure test integrity

Pros

• Wide and flexible test library covering cognitive, technical, soft skills, and role-based assessments
• Supports multilingual role-specific tests for more accurate and inclusive evaluation
• Custom tests can be created, offering flexibility to tailor assessments to specific job requirements.
• Speeds up hiring with conversational AI interviews and detailed analytics
• Robust proctoring features ensure test integrity

Cons

• The wide range of features may require some initial time to explore.
• Proctoring and analytics features require setup time but enhance security and evaluation accuracy.

What customers are saying

Testlify users praise its modern AI features and ease of use. One review notes the “intuitive, user-friendly” interface for both admins and candidates. The pre-made test library and automated grading are often highlighted as time-savers.

G2 Rating: 4.8/5 (500+ reviews)

Pricing: Starts at $69/month (Starter plan) with a free trial available. Other scalable plans are offered for growing businesses, and large enterprises can even avail a lifetime plan at $75,000/year. This top-tier plan includes unlimited candidate credits and full platform functionality, ideal for organizations with ongoing high-volume hiring needs.

2. Predictive Index (PI)

The Predictive Index is a well-established talent optimization and psychometric assessment platform used by enterprises to improve hiring accuracy, employee performance, and team alignment.

Instead of focusing on hard-skill testing, PI specializes in behavioural and cognitive assessments backed by decades of research.

Features

• Behavioral assessment: Measures four core behavioral drives, which include Dominance, Extraversion, Patience, and Formality,  providing insights into workplace behavior.
• Cognitive assessment: Evaluates a candidate’s learning agility and problem-solving ability in areas like numerical, verbal, and abstract reasoning.
• Job targeting: Helps hiring teams define ideal behavioral and cognitive profiles for each role, improving job-fit scoring.
• Team discovery tools: Visualize team dynamics, identify strengths, and uncover areas of misalignment.
• Talent optimization platform: Goes beyond hiring to support onboarding, leadership development, employee coaching, and engagement programs.

Pros

• Scientifically validated assessments for evaluating the behavioral traits and cognitive abilities of candidates
• Provides tools for creating detailed role profiles and visualizing team dynamics.
• Extends beyond recruitment into onboarding and coaching, supporting talent optimization.
• Ideal for strategic workforce planning, with a focus on long-term team success.

Cons

• Does not test technical and role-specific skills, focusing mainly on traits and cognitive abilities.
• Implementation can be complex and time-consuming, better suited for experienced analytics teams.
• It may not be cost-effective for smaller organizations with limited budgets.

What customers are saying 

Reviews note PI is “highly customizable and valid” for predicting job performance. Customers appreciate how reports highlight candidate strengths/needs.

Drawbacks mentioned include “expensive pricing” and a huge learning curve when it comes to creating assessments.

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (28 reviews)

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed; requires contacting the sales team for a custom quote.

3. The Talent Games

The Talent Games offers gamified assessments that help companies engage and evaluate candidates, especially during large-scale or campus hiring. Instead of traditional tests, it uses interactive games to measure aptitude, personality, and cultural fit.

Features

• Gamified assessments: Interactive games that measure aptitude, personality, culture-fit, and problem-solving skills.
• Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs): Realistic work scenarios to evaluate decision-making and behavioral tendencies.
• Role-specific tests: Custom assessments tailored to different job functions and industries.
• Employer branding tools: Gamified experiences that showcase a company’s culture and values.
• Data-driven insights: AI-generated reports that help hiring teams identify high-potential talent quickly.

Pros

• Offers an engaging approach to assess problem-solving, personality, and cultural fit.
• Provides situational judgment tests and immersive branded experiences for candidates.
• Uses AI analytics to identify top performers based on results derived from gamified assessments
• Ideal for campus recruiting, especially when candidate engagement is a priority.

Cons

• Premium pricing with custom quotes, often around five figures, which can be expensive for smaller teams.
• Not suitable for low-volume hiring or one-off assessments, as the pricing model is based on purchasing per game or license.
• Limited to game-based and situational judgment tests, so you may need another platform for skills testing, such as coding assessments.

What customers are saying

Users highlight that candidates “love the gamified experience,” and hiring teams find the data “fun and insightful.” Downsides include the steep cost and occasional tech hiccups. (Customer testimonials emphasize candidate engagement and predictive validity of the games.)

G2 Rating: 4.1/5 (5 reviews)

Pricing: Custom pricing based on volume and assessment type.

G

4. Codility

Codility is an online coding test and technical interview platform widely used by enterprises to assess and validate the skills of software engineering talent. It provides a comprehensive suite for coding tests, live programming interviews, and even training challenges. Codility helps teams make evidence-based hiring decisions and reduce bias in the evaluation process.

Features

• Extensive test library: Extensive library of 1100+ coding and technical tests in dozens of programming languages.
• Live technical interviews: Real-time coding interviews with a pair programming interface and code evaluation.
• Enterprise-grade features: Full anti-plagiarism suite, supports integrations with ATS, and provides detailed performance reports.
• Bias mitigation & analytics: By focusing on skill-based tasks and standardized scoring, Codility helps reduce unconscious bias in hiring. It provides analytics to assess candidates skills objectively.

Pros

• Robust live coding environment (in-browser IDE, real-time collaboration).
• Extensive library of algorithmic and language-specific problems.
• Integrates with popular ATS (Greenhouse, iCIMS, etc.) and collaboration tools.
• Advanced features like plagiarism detection and AI “Copilot” help standardize grading.

Cons

• The entry price is high, with the Starter plan costing $1,200/year for just 120 invites.
• Learning curve for admins to set up questions and tests.
• Less emphasis on non-coding/soft-skill tests (focus is on developers).

What customers are saying

Codility gets high marks for its powerful coding tools. Users highlight the intuitive VS Code–style editor and “great variety” of problems, making interviews feel realistic. 

On the downside, some note that as usage grows, the cost can become significant, and that certain integrations require extra configuration. A few also mention that the UI feels bloated, making even simple tasks like getting code to compile more cumbersome than necessary.

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (861 reviews).

Pricing: Codility offers three structured pricing tiers: the Starter plan at $1,200 per year, the Scale plan at $6,000 per year, and a custom plan for large enterprises.

5. Mercer Mettl

Mercer | Mettl (often just “Mettl”) is a comprehensive online assessment platform offering a wide array of tests for technical, cognitive, behavioral, and psychometric evaluation. Backed by the global HR consultancy Mercer, it’s known for its research-based assessments and secure proctoring. Mettl is widely used in corporate hiring, campus recruitments, and certification testing programs.

Features

• Wide range of tests: Covers over 200 job roles and levels, including domain-specific assessments, coding exams, and psychometric tests.
• Advanced proctoring: Provides a robust proctoring toolkit with AI-driven monitoring, lockdown browsers, and options for live human proctors to prevent cheating.
• Customization & branding: Allows companies to brand the assessment experience with their logo and colors, and even host tests on a custom subdomain for a seamless candidate experience.
• Reporting & analytics: Delivers detailed competency scores, percentile benchmarks, and even hiring recommendations based on assessment results.

Pros

• Comprehensive test library (aptitude, coding, domain-specific knowledge, and even psychometric and language tests).
• Supports live proctoring (webcam, browser lockdown) and remote invigilation.
• Multi-language support and GDPR-compliance for global exams.
• Excellent customer support and test consulting services.

Cons

• Pricing is custom and often requires a sizable minimum (typically sold in bulk packages).
• Not cost-effective for infrequent or small hires and is better suited when assessing hundreds of candidates.
• Reporting is extensive, but some users mention difficulty exporting consolidated data from large programs.

What customers are saying

Users report that Mettl is “very easy to use” and praise its modular test design andstrong customer support. Complaints are few but include requests for more consolidated reporting (e.g., an aggregate Excel report) and the need for a more flexible pricing model for occasional use.

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (505 reviews)

Pricing: Pricing is not publicly disclosed; Mercer Mettl offers custom quotes based on the number of tests, candidates, and specific features required

6. iMocha

iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment platform that supports both pre-employment testing and workforce upskilling. It has built a massive skills database and is known for innovative “Skills Intelligence” analytics. Companies use iMocha to test candidates on a vast range of skills from coding and IT skills to finance, language proficiency, and more.

Features

• Large test library: Over 3,000 ready-to-use assessments, covering 30,000+ skills mapped across various industries and job functions.
• Custom test creation: Allows you to build custom tests from scratch or by mixing and matching questions from iMocha’s extensive question bank.
• Conversational AI interviews: Comes with an AI virtual interviewer named Tara who engages candidates in a chat-based interview and auto-generates a report with qualitative insights on each candidate’s strengths and areas for improvement.
• AI-powered analytics: Provides detailed performance reports and benchmarks, including industry standard comparisons to help contextualize a candidate’s scores.

Pros

• Huge library (10,000+ skills, including coding, IT, business, and even soft skills).
• Includes AI-driven features (Resume Parser, Code Compare, Smart Test Generator).
• Advanced proctoring options (Live, Record & Review) and plagiarism checks.
• Robust analytics dashboards and integration with LMS/ATS.

Cons

• Even the Basic plan ($999/year for 100 attempts) is expensive for small teams.
• The interface and feature set can feel overwhelming at first (there’s a learning curve).
• No pure pay-per-use option (must commit to an annual seat-based plan).

What customers are saying

Reviewers rate iMocha highly for its rich feature set. One user calls it “very easy to use” with an “extensive array of features” that streamlined their hiring. Another praises the quality of the question library and the time saved. 

Users appreciate the dedicated customer success team and frequent updates. On the other hand, some note minor quibbles like wanting more question types (one review wished for additional variety) and the initial setup being somewhat steep.

But overall, iMocha is seen as feature-rich and reliable.

G2 Rating: 4.4/5

Pricing: 14-day free trial available. Paid plans start at around $999/year for the basic package, with pricing scaling up for larger teams and more advanced features.

7. Hirevue

Hirevue is a pioneer in the digital interviewing space that has expanded into assessments. It offers a video interviewing platform combined with game-based and AI-driven assessment modules. i

It is used globally by enterprises to streamline high-volume hiring via on-demand video interviews, coding challenges, and even AI-scored games that measure cognitive abilities and personality traits.

Features

• I/O science-backed content: Access a library of validated, role-specific interview questions and assessment content developed by industrial-organizational psychology experts.
• Video interviews (on-demand & live): Supports one-way recorded video interviews as well as live video interviews. AI technology can evaluate verbal responses, tone, and some non-verbal cues to assist in scoring candidates against set criteria.
• Game-based assessments: Offers AI-driven games that evaluate skills like problem-solving, communication, and even coding ability through engaging, gamified tests.
• Scheduling & automation: Automates many recruiting steps – it can auto-schedule interviews, engage candidates via chatbots, and seamlessly integrate with your ATS to manage the interview process.

Pros

• Comprehensive solution that supports on-demand video interviews, live interviews, coding challenges, and game-based assessments.
• Strong focus on diversity and bias reduction (AI Explainability framework, standardized scoring).
• Integrates with many HR systems; includes consulting support.

Cons

• Complexity in setup and change management can be significant for new customers.
• Customer reviews mention occasional glitches in scheduling and technical issues during live interviews.

What customers are saying

Hirevue users appreciate its ability to scale hiring processes. Reviews highlight the ease of use for scheduling and conducting interviews, noting it’s a “time-saver” since candidates have the option to self-record responses. 

On the downside, users do report issues like scheduling limitations (e.g., lack of buffer times, no rescheduling feature) and rare outages G2 Rating: 4.1/5 (253 reviews)

Pricing: HireVue provides multiple plan tiers, but pricing details are not publicly disclosed. Interested organizations need to contact HireVue for a demo and custom quote.

8. TestDome

TestDome is a skills testing platform focused on work-sample assessments. It provides over 150 ready-made tests across various domains from programming and IT roles to accounting, customer service, and more. 

TestDome’s philosophy is to evaluate applicants using tasks that closely mirror actual job work, rather than abstract quizzes, to get a realistic measure of their abilities.

Features

• Work-sample tests: Uses real-world task simulations (e.g., coding challenges, data analysis tasks, customer support scenarios) to test candidates on practical skills.
• Extensive test library: Covers roles across software development, accounting, customer service, data entry, and more. Tests are short, effective, and designed to filter out unqualified applicants quickly.
• Anti-cheating & proctoring: Includes basic proctoring measures such as optional webcam monitoring and screen recording to deter and detect cheating during tests.
• Benchmarking analytics: Provides side-by-side comparison of candidates’ scores and performance, making it easy to benchmark results and identify top performers.

Pros

• Pay-as-you-go pricing (buy test credits as needed).
• Extensive library of coding, IT, and workplace skills tests (developer, QA, data science, office skills, etc.).
• Easy online setup: turn-key tests plus basic proctoring (timers, webcam).
• Suitable for one-off or irregular hiring.

Cons

• Focuses mostly on English-language tests (no built-in localization).
• The non-technical or soft-skill test library is relatively limited.
• No free plan (the lowest tier is a 5-candidate pack at $100).

What customers are saying

Users find TestDome “very easy to use” with a clean interface. One reviewer noted it makes their recruitment process smoother and more flexible due to features like automated reminders and flexible deadlines. The ability to pay only for what you use is praised by teams doing sporadic hiring. 

Common complaints include wishing for more languages (e.g., French) and wanting a few more multiple-choice question options. But overall, TestDome’s simplicity and straightforward pricing are strong positives.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (139 reviews)

Pricing: Operates on a pay-per-candidate model. Enterprise level plans are also available for high volume hiring needs.

9. Coderbyte

Coderbyte is a technical assessment platform geared toward startups and mid-sized companies for hiring developers and data scientists. It enables unlimited coding tests, coding challenges, and even take-home project assessments on a subscription basis.

Features

• Coding challenges & projects: Offers a vast library of over 1,000 coding challenges spanning 30+ programming languages and 100+ technical skill areas. It also supports setting up full project-based exercises.
• Multiple question types: Supports various question formats including multiple-choice questions, open-ended coding questions, algorithmic challenges, SQL and database queries, and more.
• Built-in interview tools: Provides integrated tools for live technical interviews, including a real-time collaborative code editor, the ability to use spreadsheets and Jupyter Notebooks, and a virtual whiteboard for system design or diagramming.
• Reporting & analytics: Delivers comprehensive reports for each assessment, including the candidate’s code output, code playback recordings of their solution process, automated skill scoring, and benchmarking charts to compare candidates’ performance.

Pros

• Straightforward monthly plans ($199/month for the standard plan).
• Built-in code editor and a large library of coding challenges.
• Easy test creation (mix your own questions with templates) and clear candidate reports.
• Facilitates one-on-one live coding interviews through the platform.

Cons

• Exporting results (JSON/CSV) requires a higher-tier plan (extra cost).
• Lacks advanced enterprise features (focus is on coding tasks only).

What customers are saying 

Reviewers note that Coderbyte is “much less expensive than alternatives” while providing basic needed functionality. Many appreciate the ease of setup; one said it’s “super easy to configure the assessments” for candidates.

On the downside, one user warned that you can only invite 50 candidates per plan (unexpected until hit), and another mentioned it can be frustrating to pay extra for exporting results. In sum, users like the simplicity and cost-effectiveness, but be mindful of plan limits.

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (356 reviews)

Pricing: Coderbyte pricing is subscription-based, at approximately $199/month for unlimited candidates and tests. (Discounted annual plans are available for organizations that prefer yearly billing.)

10. Hiremojo

HireMojo is branded as the industry’s first hiring automation platform. It automates large parts of the recruitment process, from writing job descriptions and posting jobs to pre-screening applicants and scheduling interviews.

Features

• Automated job posting: Automatically distributes your job openings across multiple job boards and channels to attract the best candidates without extra manual effort.
• Candidate pre-screening & scoring: Uses a patented online interview and scoring system to automatically pre-screen all applicants. This helps cut through unqualified resumes and quickly surfaces the top-ranked candidates for each job.
• Job & interview content library: Offers ready-to-use templates for crafting effective job descriptions and interview questions, enabling organizations to kickstart the hiring process using proven content.
• Candidate management: Provides an end-to-end candidate management dashboard where you can view resumes, track applicant status, add notes, schedule interviews, and even send automated rejection (or “No Thank You”) emails to close the loop.

Pros

• All-in-one recruiting suite: job board distribution, candidate database, automated screening chatbots, and scheduling.
• AI-driven job marketing and resume matching to reduce manual outreach.
• Includes compliance tools and background checks.
• Unlimited user seats under flat-price plans.

Cons

• UI and UX feel dated to some users; navigation can be unintuitive.
• Not specialized for technical skill testing (more of an ATS/CRM focus).
• Pricing is flat, which can be inefficient if you have a few hires.

What customers are saying

HireMojo customers like having multiple tools in one place. One reviewer says it’s a “one-stop shop” for recruiting tasks, automating everything from marketing to interviews. Another highlights the “smart job marketing” and candidate sourcing that saves time. 

On the flip side, a user commented that the interface could use a modern redesign. Overall, feedback emphasizes efficiency gains but notes that the platform has more functionality than a simple assessment tool.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (4 reviews)

Pricing: HireMojo does not publicly disclose pricing. Interested companies will need to contact their sales team to obtain a custom quote based on hiring volume and required features.

11. HackerEarth

HackerEarth is an AI-driven tech hiring platform offering robust tools for screening and interviewing software developers. It supports standardized coding assessments, hackathons, and even remote pair-programming interviews.

Known for its advanced proctoring capabilities and vast library of coding challenges, HackerEarth is used by many enterprises to identify and hire top technical talent at scale.

Features

• Comprehensive question library: Provides access to 25,000+ questions across 15+ question types, including multiple-choice, coding problems, project-based challenges, data science scenarios, and more.
• Advanced proctoring: Utilizes AI-powered proctoring features like webcam monitoring, candidate keystroke analysis, and plagiarism detection to ensure the integrity of online assessments.
• Real-time coding interviews (FaceCode): Offers an intelligent live coding interview module (FaceCode) with a collaborative code editor, a built-in question library, HD video chat, and an interactive whiteboard for technical interviews.
• Analytics & skill reports: Generates detailed performance reports for each candidate, with skill-by-skill breakdowns and AI-generated summaries that highlight a candidate’s technical competencies and behavioral insights.

Pros

• Massive question library (many use HackerEarth’s library of thousands of coding problems).
• Unique features like FaceCode AI video interview (candidates code live on camera).
• Supports conducting virtual hackathons and competitions.
• Real-time proctoring (IP-based, webcam monitoring) and plagiarism checks.

Cons

• Rigid time limits on tests can be frustrating
• Enterprise-focused pricing means small teams may still pay for surplus features.

What customers are saying

G2 users rate HackerEarth highly for its versatile coding platform. Reviews highlight the ease of creating coding assessments and the support for multiple languages. 

However, users express concerns about the strict timers that affect candidate experience (e.g., “time limits can be restrictive for solving complex coding problems”) and occasional minor bugs in test creation.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (900 reviews)

Pricing: HackerEarth provides scalable pricing plans designed to grow with your business. Plans start at around $99 per month for basic needs, with higher-tier options available for larger teams or those needing more assessments and advanced features.

12. HackerRank

HackerRank is an enterprise-grade developer assessment platform and coding challenge hub that has been a leader in technical hiring for over a decade. It allows companies to create and administer skill-based coding tests and also facilitates live coding interviews, helping organizations effectively screen and hire software engineers.

Features

• Extensive question bank: Offers a specialized library of over 7,500 questions, predominantly coding challenges, covering 40+ programming languages and computer science topics.
• End-to-end hiring tools: Supports everything from automated coding screenings and take-home challenges to live pair-programming interview sessions, providing a unified solution for technical recruiting.
• Fair scoring: Implements robust proctoring (code plagiarism checks, webcam monitoring, etc.) and standardized scoring to ensure each developer has an equal opportunity to demonstrate their skills while maintaining assessment integrity.
• Enterprise integrations: Easily connects with popular ATS and other HR tools, allowing large organizations to integrate HackerRank into their existing hiring workflows.

Pros

• Extensive problem library (algorithmic, database, functional, domain-specific).
• Flexible “Skill Assess” and “Interview” modules for coding tests and live interviews.
• Strong anti-cheating measures (screen monitoring, plagiarism check).
• Integrates with many ATS/IDEs; well-supported with enterprise SLA.

Cons

• It can be expensive (the Starter plan is $165/month, and growth can become costly).
• Known to have a steeper learning curve for advanced use (writing tests often require multiple iterations).
• Some users feel pricing and “attempt” models favor large-volume hiring.

What customers are saying

Many companies trust HackerRank for its proven track record in tech hiring. (It’s so common that many developers have used it themselves.) Users often mention the sheer breadth of questions as a strength. 

However, consistent feedback is that building custom questions is time-consuming and that pricing is high for small teams.  G2 reviews also frequently mention its utility in consistent developer screening but also note that alternatives can be cheaper or simpler to use.

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (990 reviews)

Pricing: Offers flexible, usage-based pricing. Standard plans start at approximately $165/month for the Starter package, with higher-tier and custom enterprise plans available for expanded needs.

13. TestInvite

TestInvite is an online exam and assessment software platform built to facilitate secure and highly customizable testing. It is used for a variety of purposes including corporate hiring assessments, educational exams, and professional certifications. 

Features

• Custom test creation: Provides a powerful test builder with a wide variety of question types (multiple-choice, essay, coding, etc.), giving organizations granular control to design assessments exactly to their specifications.
• Talent assessment library: Includes a collection of ready-made tests to evaluate candidates on fundamental abilities like problem-solving, communication, and other role-specific competencies, which can be used out-of-the-box or as a starting point for customization.
• Detailed reports: Offers in-depth reporting capabilities, allowing hiring managers to modify scoring logic, derive custom metrics, compare candidate results against benchmarks or norms, and add written evaluations or interpretations based on score ranges.
• Anti-cheating & proctoring measures: Incorporates a comprehensive set of anti-cheating tools such as locked-down browser mode, AI-driven cheat detection (flagging suspicious behaviors), and randomization of questions, all to ensure assessment integrity.

Pros

• Strong anti-cheating features (lockdown browser, webcam snapshots, randomized questions).
• Extremely flexible test authoring (multi-step workflows, conditional branching).
• Good support and tutorials, quick response from the vendor.
• Offers live proctoring add-on.

Cons

• Entry plans are very basic (Starter at $37/mo includes only 5 tests and limited teammates)
• To scale beyond 500 credits/year requires upgrading to higher plans.
• Some reviews mention UI translation issues

What customers are saying

TestInvite users highlight its customer support and ease of use. One reviewer says, “very easy to use” and praises the quick support response. The platform’s data management and reliability are also commended. 

On the negative side, a few small-language-institute users mention that the French translation is imperfect and the Starter plan’s test count is limited. But generally, the consensus is that TestInvite is user-friendly and well-supported.

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (16 reviews)

Pricing: Starts at $37/month for the basic plan. Higher-tier plans with additional features and larger usage limits are available at increased pricing.

14. eSkill

eSkill is a long-established pre-employment testing platform known for its enormous variety of skills tests. It provides both ready-made and customizable assessments covering a wide range of subjects, making it a go-to solution for companies that require testing in diverse job roles.

Features

• Massive test library: Choose from over 600 ready-to-use assessments or create your own tests by selecting specific subjects, topics, and questions from eSkill’s question bank to tailor the exam to your job requirements.
• Simulations: Go beyond standard question formats with eSkill’s interactive job simulations, which evaluate how candidates perform in real-world scenarios (e.g., typing exercises, customer interaction simulations, etc.)
• Advanced proctoring: Maintains the integrity of assessments by monitoring candidate behaviors during tests — for instance, detecting copy-paste actions or tab-switching — and automatically flagging any suspicious activity in real time.
• Detailed reporting: Provides comprehensive candidate reports, including overall scores and breakdowns by subject or question type, giving insight into each applicant’s strengths and weaknesses for informed decision-making.

Pros

• A vast library spanning technical, cognitive, safety, and even software simulation tests.
• Easily mix-and-match questions to build custom assessments.
• Strong analytics and score reports (skill-gap charts, detailed breakdowns).
• Good integrations (Greenhouse, iCIMS, etc.), and multilingual support.

Cons

• Interface can be clunky: some users say it’s hard to find specific questions without searching around
• Fewer pre-built job-specific tests than promised (reviewers sometimes build exams from scratch).

What customers are saying

Users emphasize eSkill’s flexibility and breadth. For example, one recruiter says it lets them “find the most useful questions for each department” by customizing tests.g2.com. 

However, some users point out that navigating the test library can be tedious and that they would like more ready-made assessment templates to save time. A few users found the pricing to be expensive for low-volume hiring. 

In general, though, eSkill’s customer support and reporting tools are well regarded.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (341 reviews)

Pricing: eSkill does not publicly list pricing. Interested organizations need to contact eSkill’s sales team to obtain a custom pricing quote based on their testing volume and feature needs.

15. Canditech

Canditech is a newer entrant in the skills assessment market that has quickly gained acclaim (even achieving a 5.0 G2 rating). It is a job simulation platform enabling employers to evaluate candidates through realistic work scenarios.

Canditech focuses on providing an immersive assessment experience to predict how candidates will perform in actual job tasks.

Features

• Custom & expert-built tests: Build your own customized assessments or leverage Canditech’s library of 500+ expert-designed tests to create the perfect evaluation for your hiring needs.
• Job simulations: Use realistic simulations for various tasks such as coding challenges, Excel data exercises, open-ended written responses, and more – to see candidates in action on work-like activities.
• Automatic scoring: The platform automatically scores and ranks candidates based on their performance, so you can immediately identify top performers. This automation also helps remove unconscious bias by relying on objective performance data.
• Benchmarking analytics: Offers robust analytics including score benchmarks, allowing your team to compare candidates’ results against industry standards or predefined job-specific benchmarks for additional context.

Pros

• Supports complex question types (live coding with SQL/Excel scenarios, video responses, collaborative tasks).
• User-friendly test builder: easy for even non-technical users to create rich scenarios.
• Strong focus on data skills (unique SQL coding tests where candidates query a real database).

Cons

• Branding customization is limited (one user wanted more ability to “add flavor” for their brand).
• Reporting could integrate better with internal score rubrics (some users miss embedding custom rating scales)

What customers are saying

Reviews mention how easy it is to create assessments, and it is great for filtering candidates in interview processes.Criticisms include concerns like exam security and the need for better rubric integration.

Overall, Canditech’s emphasis on realistic tests and excellent support gets high marks.

G2 Rating: 5/5 (54 reviews)

Pricing: Team plan starts at $150/month for 100 candidates

Which is the best Vervoe alternative?

When considering all of these platforms, Testlify stands out as the top recommended alternative to Vervoe for both small businesses and large enterprises alike.

Testlify features an extensive test library (over 3,000 tests), AI-powered candidate evaluations, and conversational AI interviews for creating realistic job simulations at scale. It also supports 100+ ATS integrations out of the box. 

Whether you’re looking for pre-employment testing tools or a conversational AI powered interview platform for high volume hiring, Testlify excels at delivering everything you need without overwhelming your budget.

Read our in-depth Testlify vs Vervoe comparison article to help you make the best choice for your hiring needs.

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)