Testlify vs. Maki People: Which Skills Assessment Platform is Best for HR Teams?

Did you know that organizations adopting skills-based hiring tools have reported up to a 50% reduction in time-to-hire.

As a result the demand for reliable skills assessment platforms has grown exponentially and companies are gravitating toward providers with proven track records of success.

Testlify and Maki People have emerged leading skills assessment platforms in the market, each offering comprehensive pre-employment assessment capabilities designed to enhance the hiring process for organizations worldwide.

However, choosing between the two can be quite a challenge. In this article, we will be drawing comparisons between the two platforms to help you determine which platform best fits your hiring needs.

What is Testlify?

Testlify is a leading AI-powered skills assessment platform that empowers organizations to quickly identify the best candidates worldwide and make more objective hiring decisions.

How does Testlify work

Testlify is designed to optimize your hiring process. Our conversational AI powered interview & talent assessment platform enables recruiters to assess candidates’ skills with precision, empowering you to make well-informed decisions. Here’s how Testlify works:

1. Create tailored assessments

Recruiters can create tailored assessments by choosing from a library of 3,500+ pre-built tests or leveraging AI to generate custom questions. The platform supports diverse question formats, including multiple-choice, open-ended and even coding challenges.

Furthermore the platform supports the creation of conversational AI-powered interviews that simulates on-the-job scenarios across chat, voice, and video formats.

2. Send candidate invitations

Once an assessment is ready, recruiters can invite candidates via email. Candidates do not need to create an account; they can access the assessment directly through the invitation link, ensuring a smooth and user-friendly experience.

3. Advanced anti-cheating and proctoring measures

To maintain the integrity of the assessment process, Testlify incorporates advanced proctoring features. These include webcam monitoring, screen recording, browser lockdowns, and location tracking, ensuring that assessments are completed honestly and without external assistance.

4. AI-Powered scoring and analytics

Testlify employs AI to automatically score assessments, providing recruiters with detailed insights into candidates’ performance. The platform offers comprehensive reports that break down scores by skill, question type, and overall performance, facilitating informed decision-making.

5. Integration with applicant tracking systems (ATS)

To streamline the hiring workflow, Testlify integrates seamlessly with over 100 ATS platforms, including Greenhouse, Lever, and Recruitee. This allows you to effortlessly import candidates’ profiles, compare assessment results and make data driven hiring decisions.

6. Data compliance

Testlify is GDPR compliant and prioritizes the security of your recruitment data. It features advanced admin management, strong security integrations, rigorous data governance, comprehensive audits, and robust privacy protections, all backed by SOC 2 Type II, AICPA, and ISO 27001 certifications.

What is Maki People?

Founded in 2021, Maki People is a next-generation talent assessment platform dedicated to bias-free skills evaluation and an exceptional candidate experience. Offering over 200+ ready-made tests across diverse skills and roles, Maki’s “playing by the facts” philosophy ensures fair, objective hiring.

In addition to traditional tests, Maki People enhances HR operations with autonomous, AI-driven workflows that streamline every stage of talent acquisition from sourcing and screening to interviewing and final selection.

How Maki People works?

Maki People emphasizes assessing on-the-job skills of candidates with realistic, role-specific tests that accurately reflect the challenges they’ll face in the workplace. Here’s how the platform work:

1. Create assessments

From Maki’s library of 200+ expert-built tests across technical, cognitive, and behavioral domains, recruiters can choose the most relevant ones or add their own questions. Assessments can be built in under five minutes.

2. Invite candidates

Maki supports multiple invitation options: direct test links, embedding in job descriptions, or triggering via integrations with 30+ ATS platforms.

3. Candidates complete the test

Candidates complete assessments that combine traditional question formats with innovative, AI-powered job simulations, while results are captured and analyzed in real time.

4. Reporting and analytics

Results are updated in real time within a central dashboard, allowing side-by-side candidate comparisons and benchmarking against Maki’s dataset. The platform also provides automated shortlisting suggestions and enables recruiters to send personalized feedback to candidates.

5. Data compliance

Maki People complies with GDPR regulations and follows security best practices to protect candidate data. The platform uses encryption and secure data handling procedures, and commits to storing and processing data only within GDPR-compliant jurisdictions and is also ISO 27001 certified.

Testlify vs. Maki People feature comparison

Choosing the right hiring platform can transform your business. That’s why our in-depth, feature comparison of Testlify and Maki People highlights the key features you need to make the right choice.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Test library & test types

Testlify offers unique conversational AI-powered interviews (chat, voice, video), along with over 3,500 tests covering 4,500+ job roles across 50+ industries. Test types include:

• Cognitive ability tests (e.g., problem-solving, logical reasoning, attention to detail)
• Role-specific tests (e.g., tailored assessments for various job roles)
• Blue-collar hiring tests (e.g., practical skill assessments for blue-collar roles)
• Programming tests (e.g., coding, algorithm design, technical proficiency)
• Software skills tests (e.g., Microsoft Office, CRM systems, other software tools)
• Psychometric tests (e.g., personality traits, emotional intelligence, behavioral tendencies)
• Situational judgment tests (e.g., decision-making, conflict resolution, judgment in real-life situations)
• Live coding tests (e.g., real-time coding challenges and assessments)
• Typing tests (e.g., speed, accuracy, data entry proficiency)
• Language tests (e.g., proficiency in speaking and writing specific languages)

Maki People offers 150+ standardized skills assessments and AI powered job simulations to evaluate candidates’ abilities during the hiring process:

• Programming tests
• Aptitude tests
• Cognitive ability tests
• Business skills tests
• Personality tests
• Language proficiency tests
• Role-specific tests

Verdict: Testlify offers a far broader and deeper test library than Maki People. With thousands of assessments covering nearly every skill and role, Testlify can accommodate niche and emerging skill evaluations that Maki’s smaller library might not cover.

Organizations with diverse or highly specialized testing needs will benefit from Testlify’s extensive catalog. That said, Maki People’s library covers all the fundamental areas needed for common roles, and its tests are well-designed for practical relevance.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Custom question types

Testlify allows employers to create tailored assessments with 15+ custom question types, including scenario-based MCQs and AI-powered interviews.

• Multiple Choice Questions (MCQs)
• Open-ended and descriptive questions
• AI-powered Chat simulation
• AI-powered Video interview
• AI-powered Audio interview
• Custom coding questions and live coding tests
• Fill-in-the-blanks
• File upload questions
• Google Docs, Sheets, and Slides questions
• Microsoft Office questions
• Rating, number, and date questions
• Qualifier questions

Maki People enables employers to customize assessments by adding their own content in a variety of formats, including:

• Free-text responses
• Document upload
• Video/audio upload
• Single-choice
• Numerical
• Multiple-choice
• Ranking

Verdict: Both platforms offer extensive customization, enabling you to add your own questions for a truly tailored assessment experience. However, Testlify has a slight advantage with its wider variety of question types, including fully customizable coding challenges.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Conversational interviews

Testlify leverages conversational AI to simulate on-the-job scenarios across chat, voice, and video formats, bringing real-world context into the hiring process.

• Chat AI: Assess problem-solving, written communication, and critical thinking by engaging candidates in realistic text-based scenarios, like handling a billing dispute or calming an angry customer.

• Voice AI: Evaluate verbal fluency, tone, and persuasion by having candidates respond to role-specific prompts, such as those for sales or customer support.

• Video AI: AI avatars guide candidates through complex job scenarios in asynchronous video interviews, allowing employers to analyze non-verbal communication, confidence levels, and emotional intelligence.

Maki People supports one-way video interviews as part of its assessments. Recruiters can include a “video test” question that prompts candidates to record themselves answering a given prompt.

Candidates use their webcam and microphone to respond, and the platform captures the video for later review. This is useful for assessing presentation skills, language proficiency, and on-the-spot problem solving, with an emphasis on keeping the recording process candidate-friendly (including mic/camera testing and optional retakes).

In addition, Maki People now enables organizations to build one-of-a-kind AI hiring agents. These autonomous HR agents can be fully customized to align with your workflows, branding, and hiring objectives.

They manage the entire hiring journey from sourcing and screening to interviewing and selection, freeing HR teams from repetitive tasks and enabling smarter hiring decisions.

This combination of video-based assessment and AI-powered automation allows Maki to deliver both human insight and machine efficiency in a single platform.

Verdict: Both platforms recognize the value of incorporating conversational AI powered interviews into the hiring process. Maki People’s one-way video interviews, combined with its customizable AI hiring agents, offer an efficient way to automate and streamline the hiring journey.

However, Testlify maintains an edge for organizations seeking a fully immersive, multi-modal conversational AI experience. In addition to video, Testlify supports chat and voice-based interviews, enabling the creation of realistic job simulations which enables a deeper assessment of communication, situational judgment, and problem-solving skills of candidates.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Anti-cheating & proctoring features

Testlify employs advanced anti-cheating and remote proctoring features ensure that every assessment reflects real skill and genuine effort. The features include:

• Face detection
• Photo id verification
• Webcam snapshots
• Full-screen mode
• Force full-screen mode
• Dual camera proctoring
• Copy/paste tracking
• Mouse-out tracking
• IP proctoring
• Live video monitoring
• Question randomization
• Honesty Agreements
• Question-level activity logs
• AI assistance detection
• Screen recording
• Live environment check
• System requirement check
• Enforce internet speed check
• Focus guard (Anti-Cheat Mode)
• Talking prohibition

Maki People employs a robust range of anti-cheating features to closely monitor candidate activity throughout assessments, flagging suspicious behavior and areas of concern for further review. The features include:

• Multiple face detection
• Device fingerprinting
• IP geolocation monitoring
• AI-powered answer analysis
• Focus out detection
• Forced full-screen mode
• Country whitelisting

Verdict: Both platforms provide a comprehensive set of anti-cheating measures, ensuring strong protection and maintaining the highest standards of assessment integrity.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Benchmarking Analytics

Testlify comes with benchmarking analytics that provide valuable insights into candidate performance, helping organizations evaluate their candidates effectively through comparative metrics.

These metrics allow companies to benchmark candidates against industry standards, which helps to identify top performers, recognize skills gaps, and make informed hiring decisions.

Maki People also offers benchmarking analytics to compare and contextualize results, though its focus is often on internal benchmarking and test validity.

Verdict: Both platforms enable effective candidate benchmarking, but Testlify provides a richer analytical context. Testlify’s analytics not only compare candidates side-by-side but also leverage AI to summarize performance and highlight key insights.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Integrations

Testlify integrates seamlessly with 100+ ATS platforms and HRMS, allowing you to effortlessly import candidates’ profiles, compare assessment results and make data driven hiring decisions.

Maki People offers 30+ out-of-the-box integrations with major ATS platforms like Workday and SAP allowing you to send pre-hire assessments, measure results, and extend offers all from one platform.

Verdict: Testlify is built with integration in mind, offering seamless connectivity with over 100 Applicant Tracking Systems (ATS) and third-party tools. This extensive compatibility makes it highly adaptable to diverse recruitment workflows.

Testlify vs. Maki People: AI overviews

Testlify supports AI overviews, which provide a concise summary of a candidate’s overall performance in an assessment, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement to help recruiters quickly evaluate candidates.

Maki People does not advertise any comparable AI-driven analytic insights into candidate performance. The role of AI in Maki has been more on the protective side (anti-cheating) rather than interpretative. When it comes to results and reports, Maki provides scores and breakdowns, but any deeper analysis or summarization must be done by the recruiter.

Verdict: Testlify’s AI-generated overviews simplify the evaluation process by offering quick, actionable insights into candidate performance. Maki People does not come with this feature, meaning recruiters will have to put in the extra effort to interpret assessment results.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Reporting & insights

Testlify provides detailed analytics on candidate behavior, question-level insights, and benchmarking. You can visualize how candidates compare across roles and industries.

Furthermore candidate assessment reports can be easily shared with key decision-makers in PDF, Excel, or CSV formats, making it easier for them to make informed hiring decisions.

Maki People also offers a strong reporting framework, presented in three key views:

• Global view: Displays a list of all candidates invited to a particular assessment along with their overall scores. Recruiters can view each candidate’s ranking relative to the entire cohort, such as being in the top 10%, average, or bottom 20%. The interface allows sorting and filtering by score, status, or ranking to focus on top performers. Custom questions are manually rated by recruiters using a five-star system.
• Detailed view: Clicking on a candidate reveals an in-depth breakdown of their performance. The Hard skills tab shows results for job-specific, cognitive, and transversal tests, while the Personality traits tab covers results from soft skills, situational, and personality assessments.
• Assessment report: Provides a compiled report of results for the entire assessment, summarizing candidate performance in both hard and soft skills. This consolidated format helps recruiters quickly identify suitability and decide on next steps.

Verdict: Both Testlify and Maki People offer well-structured, multi-layered reporting to guide data-driven hiring decisions. However, Testlify’s richer behavioral analytics, global benchmarking visuals, and flexible export formats may give it an advantage for organizations seeking deeper insights and easier collaboration across hiring teams.

Testlify vs. Maki People: Customer support

Testlify is known for its responsive and personalized customer support, provided by human agents across multiple channels. The platform offers dedicated onboarding for new customers and priority support for enterprise clients, ensuring a great user experience.

The Testlify team also welcomes customer feedback and have been noted to roll out improvements in response to customer needs.

In addition to live support, the platform also features a help center with documentation, FAQs, and best practice guides, so your team can self-serve answers to common questions.

Maki People offers basic customer support that aligns with a lean startup approach. The primary support channel for Maki users is email support, and the company has a help center (knowledge base) with articles to answer common questions

Verdict: Testlify provides a higher level of customer support and service, which can be crucial for enterprise deployments. With options like live chat and phone support, along with dedicated onboarding and training, Testlify ensures that users are never left stranded.

In contrast, Maki People’s support is limited to email and help articles, which, while sufficient for many day-to-day inquiries, might delay resolution of time-sensitive issue

Testlify vs. Maki People: Pricing plans

Testlify offers flexible pricing plans that scale with your business, providing everything from basic assessments for startups to advanced features for enterprise-level hiring.

• Starter plan: Ideal for small teams and startups, this plan starts at $139/month (billed at $1,663/year) and includes 100 candidate credits at $17 per credit with support for 3 users.
• Starter: Designed for growing businesses, the Starter starts at $279/month (billed at $3,343/year) and includes 300 credits at $11 per credit with support for 5 users.
• Starter: Built for scaling teams, this plan costs $699/month (billed at $4,192/year) and includes 1,000 credits at $8 per credit with 10 users.
• Premium plan: Suited for high-growth organizations, the Premium plan includes 3,000 credits and supports 20 users, with pricing available upon contacting the sales team.
• Enterprise plan: Designed for large enterprises, this plan includes 10,000 credits and supports 30 users with pricing available upon contacting the sales team.
• Enterprise Plus plan: Designed for large-scale hiring programs, this plan includes 25,000 credits and supports up to 40 users, with pricing details available after contacting the sales team.
• Unlimited plan: For companies seeking unrestricted access, Testlify offers an unlimited plan that includes unlimited candidate credits and full platform functionality, with pricing available on request from the sales team.

Maki People does not disclose its pricing on its website. Recruiters and employers must contact the sales team directly to discuss requirements and obtain a custom quote, which may vary based on factors such as assessment type, scale of hiring, and additional services. This approach allows for tailored solutions but makes cost comparisons less transparent for potential customers.

Verdict: In terms of pricing flexibility, Testlify’s transparent tiered plans make it straightforward to choose a subscription that matches your hiring volume and feature needs. The existence of a clear unlimited option at a known price point is also a plus for planning budgets.

With Testlify, you can start small and scale up as your usage grows, without unexpected costs, you pay more as you need more features or higher candidate volumes.

Is Testlify a better alternative to Maki People?

Testlify and Maki People are both strong contenders in the skills assessment space, but which platform is better ultimately depends on your hiring goals, team structure, and candidate evaluation strategy. That said, Testlify emerges as the stronger alternative and here’s why:

• Broader test coverage: Testlify provides a much larger and more diverse test library, featuring over 3,000 assessments tailored to 4,500+ job roles across 50+ industries. In comparison, Maki People’s 150+ test library is well-crafted but more limited in scope, focusing on common business, technical, and soft skills . For companies with diverse hiring needs or specialized roles, Testlify provides greater coverage and flexibility.
• Extensive ATS integrations: Testlify integrates with over 100 ATS and HR platforms, compared to Maki’s 30+ ATS integrations . This broader compatibility makes it much easier for Testlify to fit into complex or multi-platform recruiting ecosystems, streamlining workflows and data sharing across systems.
• AI insights: Testlify’s AI-generated performance summaries and automated scoring for open-ended, audio, and video responses help recruiters quickly interpret results and make informed decisions. Maki’s insights rely on human interpretation of results, which, while still effective, can be more time-consuming for high-volume hiring.
• Customer support and onboarding: Testlify provides multi-channel support including live chat, email, and phone for enterprise clients, along with dedicated onboarding, training, and customer success managers for higher-tier plans. Maki People offers responsive email-based support and a help center but lacks real-time chat or phone support. For organizations where timely assistance and guided onboarding are critical, Testlify delivers a more comprehensive and hands-on support experience.

Other best alternatives to Maki People

Final thoughts

While Maki People is an excellent choice for teams prioritizing a bias-free, branded candidate journey and straightforward setup, Testlify stands out as the more robust, scalable, and future-ready option. Its broader content, deeper integration capabilities, AI-enhanced analytics, and superior customer support make it a compelling choice for organizations seeking to elevate their hiring process end-to-end.

Book a demowith Testlify to explore how it can elevate your hiring strategy.

.