Top 15 TestGorilla Alternatives and Competitors

Skills assessment and interviewing tools have become an essential part of the recruitment process, enabling HR and TA teams to identify top talent. Yet, not all tools keep up with the evolving needs of hiring teams, and TestGorilla is a prime example. 

While TestGorilla has earned visibility as a convenient skills assessment solution, many now consider it limited in key areas such as test customization and proctoring capabilities. As hiring needs grow more complex, these shortcomings become increasingly difficult to overlook.

Today, organizations need an assessment tool that lets HR teams fully customize tests for company-specific roles. They also expect stronger proctoring to protect test integrity and deliver a smoother hiring experience.

As a result, companies are actively exploring TestGorilla alternatives, such as Testlify, that offer 3500+ role-specific tests. Platforms such as Testlify also provide stronger proctoring features, such as AI-assistance detection, photo ID verification, and image analysis.

With that said, in this blog post, we’ll explore the Top 15 TestGorilla Alternatives, comparing their features, G2 ratings, and pricing to help you choose the best tool for your recruitment needs.

Summarise this post with:

Why companies no longer prefer TestGorilla

Many companies are rethinking their use of TestGorilla due to recurring challenges. Our research shows that these pain points are pushing HR teams to explore alternatives, with platforms like Testlify emerging as the preferred choice.

• Small test library: TestGorilla’s library has on the order of 400+ tests. In practice, companies needing specialized or niche assessments often run out of relevant options. 
• Limited question types: TestGorilla only supports a few question formats (multiple-choice, essay, video response, and file upload). From a user perspective, this makes each assessment feel formulaic.
• Proctoring limitations: TestGorilla offers basic proctoring features such as full-screen tracking and multiple-attempt prevention. However, these features fall short compared to platforms such as Testlify, which offers AI-assistance detection, dual-camera proctoring, and more intelligent behaviour-tracking features.
• Escalating costs: Large enterprises seek tools that offer unlimited team seats, allowing everyone to access the platform without incurring extra costs. Here, TestGorilla’s pricing structure can be limiting as it charges based on the number of users or seats.
• Annual commitment required: Even the lowest plans on TestGorilla require an annual commitment, making it less than ideal for recruitment teams with tight budgets or seasonal hiring requirements.

As you can see, TestGorilla has its fair share of limitations; however, there are better alternatives in the market. Let’s quickly take a look at some of the best Testgorilla alternatives that will better suit your needs. Here’s a quick comparison:

1. Testlify

Testlify is a leading AI-powered skills assessment and interviewing platform that features 3,500+ role-specific tests available in 8+ languages, enabling companies to hire confidently across global talent markets.

In addition to technical and role-based assessments, Testlify also offers a comprehensive suite of psychometric tests to help evaluate candidates’ cognitive abilities, personality traits, and job fit.

Features

• Extensive test library: Over 3,500 pre-built tests covering technical, cognitive, and soft skills. Custom tests can also be created.
• Custom question formats: Supports 25+ question types ranging from standard MCQs and essay responses to innovative video AI and voice AI interviewing formats.
• Conversational AI interviews: Simulate on-the-job scenarios across chat, voice, and video formats to provide a realistic candidate experience.
• Psychometric assessments: Supports a wide range of psychometric tests that measure personality, behavior, and thinking style of candidates.
• AI insights: Generate concise summaries of candidates’ performance, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.
• Extensive ATS integrations: Supports over 100 ATS integrations such as Zapier and Zoho Recruit to streamline recruitment workflows.
• Anti-cheating & proctoring: Features 18+ anti-cheating and proctoring measures such as dual-camera proctoring, AI assistance detection, live video proctoring, and more to ensure test integrity

Pros

• Wide and flexible test library covering cognitive, technical, soft skills, and role-based assessments
• Supports multilingual role-specific tests for more accurate and inclusive evaluation
• Custom tests can be created, offering flexibility to tailor assessments to specific job requirements.
• Speeds up hiring with conversational AI interviews and detailed analytics
• Robust proctoring features ensure test integrity

Cons

• The wide range of features may require some initial time to explore.
• Proctoring and analytics features require setup time but enhance security and evaluation accuracy.

What customers are saying

Testlify users consistently praise its modern AI capabilities and overall ease of use. Many highlight the intuitive, user-friendly interface that simplifies the experience for both administrators and candidates.

Customers value the extensive library of role-specific tests and the deep customization options, which allow them to tailor assessments precisely to the skill levels required for each position.

The platform’s AI interviews are also mentioned as a valuable feature for efficient initial screening, while the AI-driven scoring system helps hiring teams evaluate candidates with greater accuracy.

Testlify vs TestGorilla direct comparison

This comparison presents a detailed, side-by-side evaluation of Testlify and TestGorilla across essential product performance categories, offering a clear view of how each platform is rated by customers.

G2 Rating: 4.8/5 (500+ reviews)

Pricing: Starts at $69/month (Starter plan) with a free trial available. Other scalable plans are offered for growing businesses, and large enterprises can even avail the unlimited plan at $75,000/year. This plan includes unlimited candidate credits and full platform functionality, ideal for large enterprises with ongoing, high-volume hiring needs.

2. Predictive Index (PI)

The Predictive Index is a well-established talent optimization and psychometric assessment platform used by enterprises to improve hiring accuracy, employee performance, and team alignment.

Instead of focusing on hard-skill testing, PI specializes in behavioural and cognitive assessments backed by decades of research.

Features

• Behavioral assessment: Measures four core behavioral drives, which include Dominance, Extraversion, Patience, and Formality,  providing insights into workplace behavior.
• Cognitive assessment: Evaluates a candidate’s learning agility and problem-solving ability in areas like numerical, verbal, and abstract reasoning.
• Job targeting: Helps hiring teams define ideal behavioral and cognitive profiles for each role, improving job-fit scoring.
• Team discovery tools: Visualize team dynamics, identify strengths, and uncover areas of misalignment.
• Talent optimization platform: Goes beyond hiring to support onboarding, leadership development, employee coaching, and engagement programs.

Pros

• Scientifically validated assessments for evaluating the behavioral traits and cognitive abilities of candidates
• Provides tools for creating detailed role profiles and visualizing team dynamics.
• Extends beyond recruitment into onboarding and coaching, supporting talent optimization.
• Ideal for strategic workforce planning, with a focus on long-term team success.

Cons

• Does not test technical and role-specific skills, focusing mainly on traits and cognitive abilities.
• Implementation can be complex and time-consuming, better suited for experienced analytics teams.
• It may not be cost-effective for smaller organizations with limited budgets.

What customers are saying 

Reviews note PI is “highly customizable and valid” for predicting job performance. Customers appreciate how reports highlight candidate strengths/needs.

Drawbacks mentioned include “expensive pricing” and a huge learning curve when it comes to creating assessments.

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (28 reviews)

Pricing: Not publicly disclosed; requires contacting the sales team for a custom quote.

3. The Talent Games

The Talent Games offers gamified assessments that help companies engage and evaluate candidates, especially during large-scale or campus hiring. Instead of traditional tests, it uses interactive games to measure aptitude, personality, and cultural fit.

Features

• Gamified assessments: Interactive games that measure aptitude, personality, culture-fit, and problem-solving skills.
• Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs): Realistic work scenarios to evaluate decision-making and behavioral tendencies.
• Role-specific tests: Custom assessments tailored to different job functions and industries.
• Employer branding tools: Gamified experiences that showcase a company’s culture and values.
• Data-driven insights: AI-generated reports that help hiring teams identify high-potential talent quickly.

Pros

• Offers an engaging approach to assess problem-solving, personality, and cultural fit.
• Provides situational judgment tests and immersive branded experiences for candidates.
• Uses AI analytics to identify top performers based on results derived from gamified assessments
• Ideal for campus recruiting, especially when candidate engagement is a priority.

Cons

• Premium pricing with custom quotes, often around five figures, which can be expensive for smaller teams.
• Not suitable for low-volume hiring or one-off assessments, as the pricing model is based on purchasing per game or license.
• Limited to game-based and situational judgment tests, so you may need another platform for skills testing, such as coding assessments.

What customers are saying

Users highlight that candidates “love the gamified experience,” and hiring teams find the data “fun and insightful.” Downsides include the steep cost and occasional tech hiccups. (Customer testimonials emphasize candidate engagement and predictive validity of the games.)

G2 Rating: 4.1/5 (5 reviews)

Pricing: Custom pricing based on volume and assessment type.

4. Codility

Codility is an online coding test & interview platform widely used by enterprises for assessing and validating the skills of tech talent. It provides a comprehensive platform for coding tests, tech interviews, and even training tests. Codility helps teams make evidence-based hiring decisions with features to reduce bias and save engineering time.

Features

• Extensive test library: Extensive library of 1100+ coding and technical tests in dozens of programming languages.
• Live technical interviews: Real-time coding interviews with a pair programming interface and code evaluation.
• Enterprise-grade features: Full anti-plagiarism suite, supports integrations with ATS, and provides detailed performance reports.
• Bias mitigation & analytics: By focusing on skill-based tasks and standardized scoring, Codility helps reduce unconscious bias in hiring. It provides analytics to compare candidates objectively.

Pros

• Comprehensive live coding environment (in-browser IDE, AI assistant).
• Extensive library of algorithmic and language-specific problems.
• Integrates with popular ATS (Greenhouse, iCIMS, etc.) and collaboration tools.
• Advanced features like plagiarism detection and AI “Copilot” help standardize grading.

Cons

• The entry price is high, with the Starter plan costing $1,200/year for just 120 invites.
• Learning curve for admins to set up questions and tests.
• Less emphasis on non-coding/soft-skill tests (focus is on developers).
  

What customers are saying

Codility gets high marks for its powerful coding tools. Users highlight the intuitive VS Code–style editor and “great variety” of problems, making interviews feel realistic. 

On the downside, some note that as usage grows, the cost can become significant, and that certain integrations require extra configuration. A few also mention that the UI feels bloated, making even simple tasks like getting code to compile more cumbersome than necessary.

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (861 reviews)

Pricing: Codility offers three structured pricing tiers: the Starter plan at $1,200 per year, the Scale plan at $6,000 per year, and a custom plan for large enterprises

5. Mercer Mettl

Mercer | Mettl (often just “Mettl”) is a comprehensive online assessment platform offering a suite of tests for technical, cognitive, behavioral, and psychometric evaluation. Backed by Mercer, it’s known for its research-based assessments and secure proctoring  widely used in corporate hiring, campus recruitment, and certification testing.

Features

• Wide range of tests: Over 200+ job roles and levels covered, including domain-specific exams and coding tests.
• Anti-cheating and proctoring measures: Provides a robust proctoring toolkit, featuring AI monitoring, lockdown browsers, and human proctoring options.
• Customization and branding: Organizations can have their logo displayed on the test screen, use their own color themes or backgrounds, and host assessments on a custom subdomain.
• Reporting and analytics: Provides detailed competency scores, percentile benchmarks, and hiring recommendations.

Pros

• Comprehensive test library (aptitude, coding, domain-specific knowledge, and even psychometric and language tests).
• Supports live proctoring (webcam, browser lockdown) and remote invigilation.
• Multi-language support and GDPR-compliance for global exams.
• Excellent customer support and test consulting services.

Cons

• Pricing is custom and often requires a sizable minimum (typically sold in bulk packages).
• Not cost-effective for infrequent or hiring on a small scale.
• Reporting is extensive, but some users mention difficulty exporting consolidated data from large programs.

What customers are saying

Users report that Mettl is “very easy to use” and praise its modular test design andstrong customer support. Complaints are few but include requests for more consolidated reporting (e.g., an aggregate Excel report) and the need for a more flexible pricing model for occasional use.

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (505 reviews)

Pricing: Custom quote based on the number of tests and usage.

6. iMocha

iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment platform that supports both pre-employment testing and workforce upskilling. iMocha has built a massive skills database and is known for its innovative Skills Intelligence features. Companies use iMocha to test candidates on a variety of skills ranging from coding and IT to finance, language, and more.

Features

• Large test library: Over 3000+ ready-to-use tests and 30,000+ skills mapped across industries.
• Custom test creation: Build your own tests from scratch or by combining existing questions present on the platform.
• Conversational interviews: Comes with an AI interviewer named Tara who engages in conversations with candidates and auto-generates a report that provides qualitative insights on the candidate’s strengths and areas of improvements.
• AI-powered analytics: Detailed performance reports with benchmarking against industry standards.

Pros

• Huge library (10,000+ skills, including coding, IT, business, and even soft skills).
• Includes AI-driven features (Resume Parser, Code Compare, Smart Test Generator).
• Advanced proctoring options (Live, Record & Review) and plagiarism checks.
• Robust analytics dashboards and integration with LMS/ATS.

Cons

• Even the Basic plan ($999/year for 100 attempts) is expensive for small teams.
• The interface and feature set can feel overwhelming at first (there’s a learning curve).
• No pure pay-per-use option (must commit to an annual seat-based plan).

What customers are saying

Reviewers rate iMocha highly for its rich feature set. One user calls it “very easy to use” with an “extensive array of features” that streamlined their hiring. Another praises the quality of the question library and the time saved. 

Users appreciate the dedicated customer success team and frequent updates. On the other hand, some note minor quibbles like wanting more question types (one review wished for additional variety) and the initial setup being somewhat steep. 

But overall, iMocha is seen as feature-rich and reliable.

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (276 reviews)

Pricing: 14-day free trial available. Plans start at $1100/year (basic plan) and scale up for larger teams.

7. Hirevue

Hirevue is a pioneer in the digital interviewing space that has expanded into assessments. It offers a video interviewing platform combined with game-based and AI-driven assessments. It is used globally by enterprises to streamline high-volume hiring with on-demand video interviews, coding challenges, and even AI-scored games that measure cognitive ability and personality.

Features

• IO Science content library: Access to validated role specific interview content.
• Video interviews (On-demand & live): One-way and live video interviews with scoring rubrics. AI is used to capture non-verbal cues and evaluates the verbal response content and tone.
• Game-based assessments: AI-driven cognitive games that measure problem-solving, communication, and coding skills.
• Scheduling and Automation: Auto-schedules interviews, engages candidates via chatbots, and integrates with your ATS.

Pros

• Offers verbal and nonverbal analytics for interviews.
• Comprehensive solution – supports on-demand video interviews, live interviews, coding challenges, and game-based assessments.
• Strong focus on diversity and bias reduction (AI Explainability framework, standardized scoring).
• Integrates with many HR systems; includes consulting support.

Cons

• Complexity: setup and change management can be significant for new customers.
• Customer reviews mention occasional glitches in scheduling and technical issues during live interviews.

What customers are saying

Hirevue users appreciate its ability to scale hiring processes. Reviews highlight the ease of use for scheduling and conducting interviews, noting it’s a “time-saver” since candidates have the option to self-record responses. 

On the downside, users do report issues like scheduling limitations (e.g., lack of buffer times, no rescheduling feature) and rare outages 

G2 Rating: 4.1/5 (253 reviews)

Pricing: Hirevue offers three plan tiers, but pricing is not publicly disclosed and requires users to get in touch with the Hirevue team for more details.

8. TestDome

TestDome is a skills testing platform focused on work-sample assessments. It provides over 150 pre-made tests across various domains from programming and IT to accounting, customer service, and more. TestDome’s philosophy is to test applicants with tasks that closely mirror actual job work.

Features

• Work-sample tests: Real-world tasks (e.g., coding, data entry, customer service scenarios).
• Library of 150+ pre-built tests: Covers roles across software development, accounting, customer service, data entry, and more. Tests are short, effective, and designed to filter out unqualified applicants quickly.
• Anticheating & proctoring measures: Includes basic proctoring measures such as webcam monitoring and screen recording to deter and detect cheating.
• Benchmarking analytics: Provides side-by-side comparisons of candidates based on test scores.

Pros

• Pay-as-you-go pricing (buy test credits as needed).
• Extensive library of coding, IT, and workplace skills tests (developer, QA, data science, office skills, etc.).
• Easy online setup: turn-key tests plus basic proctoring (timers, webcam).
• Suitable for one-off or irregular hiring.

Cons

• Focuses mostly on English-language tests (no built-in localization).
• The non-technical or soft-skill test library is relatively limited.
• No free plan (the lowest tier is a 5-candidate pack at $100).

What customers are saying

Users find TestDome “very easy to use” with a clean interface. One reviewer noted it makes their recruitment process smoother and more flexible due to features like automated reminders and flexible deadlines. The ability to pay only for what you use is also praised by teams enaging in sporadic hiring.

Common complaints include wishing for more languages (e.g., French) and wanting a few more multiple-choice question options. But overall, TestDome’s simplicity and straightforward pricing are strong positives.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (139 reviews)

Pricing: Pay-per-candidate model. For example, $100 for 5 candidates.

9. Coderbyte

Coderbyte is a technical assessment platform geared towards startups and mid-sized firms for hiring developers and data scientists. It enables unlimited coding tests, technical screening challenges, and even take-home projects on a subscription basis.

Features

• Coding challenges & projects: Massive library of 1,000+ coding challenges, 30+ languages, & 100+ skills.
• Multiple question types: Includes multiple-choice questions, open-ended responses, and SQL queries.
• Built-in interviewing tools: Supports live video coding interviews with collaborative tools including a real-time code editor, spreadsheets, Jupyter Notebooks, and a virtual whiteboard.
• Reporting and analytics: Coderbyte offers a comprehensive reporting and analytics for each coding assessment, which includes several key components such as the candidate’s code, code video recordings, skill ratings and internal benchmarking charts.

Pros

• Straightforward monthly plans ($199/month for the standard plan).
• Built-in code editor and a large library of coding challenges.
• Easy test creation (mix your own questions with templates) and clear candidate reports.
• Facilitates one-on-one live coding interviews through the platform.

Cons

• Exporting results (JSON/CSV) requires a higher-tier plan (extra cost).
• Lacks advanced enterprise features (focus is on coding tasks only).

What customers are saying 

Reviewers note that Coderbyte is “much less expensive than alternatives” while providing basic needed functionality. Many appreciate the ease of setup; one said it’s “super easy to configure the assessments” for candidates.

On the downside, one user warned that you can only invite 50 candidates per plan (unexpected until hit), and another mentioned it can be frustrating to pay extra for exporting results. In sum, users like the simplicity and cost-effectiveness, but be mindful of plan limits.

G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (356 reviews)

Pricing: $199/month (unlimited candidates and tests). Annual plans are available at a discount.

10. Hiremojo

HireMojo is dubbed the industry’s first hiring automation platform. It automates the entire recruitment process from writing job descriptions to posting jobs, pre-screening applicants, scheduling interviews, and more.

Features

• Automated job posting: Distributes job openings across job boards where you’ll find the best candidates.
• Candidate Pre-Screen & Scoring: Automatically pre-screen and rank all applicants. The platform uses a patented online interview process that lets you cut through all of the unqualified resumes to identify top candidates with ease.
• Job and Interview Content Library: Offers ready-to-use templates for creating job descriptions and interview questions, enabling organizations to streamline the hiring process.
• Candidate Management: Easily view candidate resumes, track their status, access notes, schedule interviews, and send ‘No Thank You’ emails to complete the hiring loop.

Pros

• All-in-one recruiting suite: job board distribution, candidate database, automated screening chatbots, and scheduling.
• AI-driven job marketing and resume matching to reduce manual outreach.
• Includes compliance tools (EEO reporting) and background checks.
• Unlimited user seats under flat-price plans.

Cons

• UI and UX feel dated to some users; navigation can be unintuitive.
• Not specialized for technical skill testing (more of an ATS/CRM focus).
• Pricing is flat, which can be inefficient if you have a few hires.

What customers are saying

Hiremojo customers like having multiple tools in one place. One reviewer says it’s a “one-stop shop” for recruiting tasks, automating everything from marketing to interviews. Another highlights the “smart job marketing” and candidate sourcing that saves time. 

On the flip side, a user commented that the interface could use a modern redesign. Overall, feedback emphasizes efficiency gains but notes that the platform has more functionality than a simple assessment tool.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (4 reviews)

Pricing: Hiremojo does not disclose its pricing publicly. Recruiters need to get in touch with the sales team to get a custom quote

11. HackerEarth

HackerEarth is an AI-driven tech hiring platform that provides robust tools for screening developers. It supports standardized coding assessments, hackathons, and even remote interviews. Known for its advanced proctoring capabilities and variety of coding challenges, HackerEarth is used by enterprises to identify top tech talent at scale.

Features

• Comprehensive Test Library: Choose from a library of 25,000+ questions across 15+ question types, including multiple choice, project-based, and data science questions.
• Advanced Proctoring: Features like AI powered webcam monitoring and plagiarism detection ensure the integrity of assessments.
• Real-Time Interviews (FaceCode): Intelligent live coding interview tool that comes with a collaborative code editor, a built-in question library, HD video chat and a whiteboard.
• Analytics & Skill Reports: Provides detailed skill-based performance reports and AI powered summaries that highlights technical performance and behavioral insights of candidates interviewed.

Pros

• Massive question library (many use HackerEarth’s library of thousands of coding problems).
• Unique features such as FaceCode AI video interview (candidates code live on camera).
• Supports conducting virtual hackathons and competitions.
• Real-time proctoring (IP-based, webcam monitoring) and plagiarism checks.

Cons

• Rigid time limits on tests can be frustrating
• Enterprise-focused pricing means small teams may still pay for surplus features.

What customers are saying

G2 users rate HackerEarth highly for its versatile coding platform. Reviews highlight the ease of creating coding assessments and the support for multiple languages.

However, users express concerns about the strict timers that affect candidate experience (e.g., “time limits can be restrictive for solving complex coding problems”) and occasional minor bugs in test creation.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (900 reviews)

Pricing: HackerEarth offers scalable pricing plans designed to grow with your business. Pricing plans start at $99 per month, with higher-tier plans available to support larger teams and advanced hiring needs

12. HackerRank

HackerRank is an enterprise-grade developer assessment platform and coding challenge hub that has been on the market for over a decade. It enables companies to create skill-based technical assessments to screen candidates effectively.

Features

• Extensive question bank: HackerRank’s test library is specialized for technical hiring offers a library, featuring over 7500 questions which is mostly comprised of coding challenges across 40+ programming languages.
• Screen, interview, and beyond: Coding tests, live pair programming, and interview tools.
• Fair scoring: Leverages multiple proctoring and user signals to ensure each developer has an equal opportunity to demonstrate their skills, while maintaining the integrity of the assessment.
• Enterprise integrations: Supports integrations with ATS and other recruitment tools.

Pros

• Extensive problem library (algorithmic, database, functional, domain-specific).
• Flexible “Skill Assess” and “Interview” modules for coding tests and live interviews.
• Strong anti-cheating measures (screen monitoring, plagiarism check).
• Integrates with many ATS/IDEs; well-supported with enterprise SLA.

Cons

• It can be expensive (the Starter plan is $165/month, and growth can become costly).
• Known to have a steeper learning curve for advanced use (writing tests often require multiple iterations).
• Some users feel pricing and “attempt” models favor large-volume hiring.

What customers are saying

Many companies trust HackerRank for its proven track record in tech hiring. (It’s so common that many developers have used it themselves.) Users often mention the sheer breadth of questions as a strength. However, consistent feedback is that building custom questions is time-consuming and that pricing is high for small teams.

G2 reviews also frequently mention its utility in consistent developer screening, but also note that alternatives can be cheaper or simpler to use.

G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (990 reviews)

Pricing: Flexible usage-based pricing. Plans start at $165/month for the Starter plan.

13. TestInvite

TestInvite is a comprehensive online exam and assessment software built to facilitate secure, highly customizable testing for various purposes, including corporate hiring, education, and certification.

Features

• Custom test creation: Provides a highly flexible test builder with a wide variety of custom question types making it ideal for organizations seeking granular control and flexibility in test creation.
• Talent assessment library: Use pre-built tests to assess candidates on essential abilities such as problem-solving, communication, and other role-specific competencies.
• Detailed reports: Enhance candidate reports by modifying scoring logic, deriving new metrics, comparing results against benchmarks or norms, categorizing scores, and adding textual interpretations for different score ranges.
• Anti-cheating and proctoring measures: TestInvite incorporates a comprehensive set of anti-cheating measures, such as lockdown browsers, AI-driven cheating detection, and question randomization, all designed to ensure the integrity of assessments.

Pros

• Strong anti-cheating features (lockdown browser, webcam snapshots, randomized questions).
• Extremely flexible test authoring (multi-step workflows, conditional branching).
• Good support and tutorials, quick response from the vendor.
• Offers live proctoring add-on.

Cons

• Entry plans are very basic (Starter at $37/mo includes only 5 tests and limited teammates)
• To scale beyond 500 credits/year requires upgrading to higher plans.
• Some reviews mention UI translation issues.

What customers are saying

TestInvite users highlight its customer support and ease of use. One reviewer says, “very easy to use” and praises the quick support response. The platform’s data management and reliability are also commended.

On the negative side, a few small-language-institute users mention that the French translation is imperfect and the Starter plan’s test count is limited. But generally, the consensus is that TestInvite is user-friendly and well-supported.

G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (16 reviews)

Pricing: Starts at $37/month (basic plan). Pricing increases for more features.

14. eSkill

eSkill is a long-established pre-employment testing platform known for its huge variety of skills tests. It offers both ready-made and custom assessments covering clerical skills, software proficiency, literacy and math, accounting, legal, call center scenarios, you name it.

Features

• Massive test library: Choose from over 600 ready-to-use assessments or create custom tests by selecting subjects, topics, and questions tailored to your job or training needs.
• Simulations: Go beyond multiple-choice questions with eSkill’s interactive job simulation tests that evaluate how candidates perform in real-world job scenarios.
• Anti-cheating and advanced proctoring: Enables organizations maintain the integrity of assessments by monitoring behaviors such as copy-pasting and tab switching, automatically flagging any suspicious activity in real time.
• Reporting and analytics: Access detailed candidate reports, including overall scores and performance breakdowns by subject or question, allowing you to gain insights into each applicant’s strengths and weaknesses.

Pros

• Vast library spanning technical, cognitive, safety, and even software simulation tests.
• Easily mix-and-match questions to build custom assessments.
• Strong analytics and score reports (skill-gap charts, detailed breakdowns).
• Good integrations (Greenhouse, iCIMS, etc.), and multilingual support.

Cons

• Interface can be clunky: some users say it’s hard to find specific questions without searching around
• Fewer pre-built job-specific tests than promised (reviewers sometimes have to build exams from scratch).

What customers are saying

Users emphasize eSkill’s flexibility and breadth. For example, one recruiter says it lets them “find the most useful questions for each department” by customizing tests. 

However, some users point out that navigating the test library can be tedious and that they would like more ready-made assessment templates to save time. A few users found the pricing to be expensive for low-volume hiring.

In general, though, eSkill’s customer support and reporting tools are well regarded.

G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (341 reviews)

Pricing: eSkill does not disclose its pricing publicly. Recruiters need to get in touch with the sales team to get a custom quote

15. Canditech

Canditech is a newer entrant that has quickly gained acclaim (even achieving a 5.0 G2 rating). It is a job simulation assessment platform enabling employers to evaluate candidates through realistic work scenarios.

Features

• Custom & expert-built tests: Create your own custom assessments or leverage Canditech’s extensive library of over 500 pre-built tests to design the perfect assessment for your hiring needs
• Job Simulations: Simulations for coding, Excel exercises, open-text responses, and more.
• Automatic scoring: Candidates are automatically ranked based on performance so that you can focus on the applicants with the best chances of success in their future roles, eliminating unconscious human bias.
• Benchmarking analytics: Offers score benchmarking, enabling companies to compare employee performance on various assessments against industry standards or job-specific benchmarks.

Pros

• Supports complex question types (live coding with SQL/Excel scenarios, video responses, collaborative tasks).
• User-friendly test builder: easy for even non-technical users to create rich scenarios.
• Strong focus on data skills (unique SQL coding tests where candidates query a real database).

Cons

• Branding customization is limited (one user wanted more ability to “add flavor” for their brand).
• Reporting could integrate better with internal score rubrics (some users miss embedding custom rating scales)

What customers are saying

Reviews mention how easy it is to create assessments, and it is great for filtering candidates in interview processes.

Criticisms include concerns like exam security and the need for better rubric integration. Overall, Canditech’s emphasis on realistic tests and excellent support gets high marks.

G2 Rating: 5/5 (54 reviews)

Pricing: Team plan starts at $150/month for 100 candidates

Which is the best TestGorilla alternative?

Testlify stands out as the best choice for both SMBs and large enterprises. It offers an extensive test library (over 3,500 tests), AI-powered candidate evaluations, and conversational AI interviews that simulate real job tasks. It also supports 100+ ATS integrations out of the box. 

So whether your hiring needs are specialized or high-volume, Testlify excels at delivering everything you need without overwhelming your budget.

Read our in-depth Testlify vs TestGorilla comparison article to make the best choice for your hiring needs and book a demo to see how Testlify can transform your hiring process.

Frequently asked questions (FAQs)