Mercer | Mettl is known for its comprehensive assessment offerings and secure proctoring, used widely in corporate and campus recruitment. However, many organizations find that Mettl falls short in key areas such as test customization, customer support, and ease of use.
These pain points, along with the absence of features such as conversational AI interviews and AI insights, have prompted many HR teams to explore alternatives such as Testlify
Today’s hiring landscape demands platforms that offer larger test libraries, richer question formats, stronger proctoring, and budget-friendly pricing models.
To help you find the right fit, we’ve compiled the top 15 Mercer Mettl alternatives, complete with their features, G2 ratings, and pricing. Each of these platforms can potentially address Mettl’s limitations and better align with your recruitment needs.
Summarise this post with:
Why companies are looking for alternatives to Mercer Mettl
- Clunky user interface: Users report that Mettl’s interface is not intuitive, requiring extra clicks and page-switching to view test data, which slows down recruiters. The overall UX feels dated, as noted by some customers.
- Limited customization: Mettl offers fewer customization options than competitors, restricting the ability to tailor tests to specific roles or industries. You may not be able to add unique question types or branding elements as freely as on other platforms.
- Rigid pricing model: There’s no self-serve pricing as customers will have to directly contact the company’s contact sales team for a quote, often involving bulk commitments.
- Niche focus: Mercer Mettl excels in high-volume campus hiring with its huge question bank and proctoring features, but for low-volume or highly specialized hiring, it can be overkill.
If you’re experiencing these limitations, it’s an ideal time to consider alternatives that deliver a better candidate experience, more innovation, and greater flexibility. Below is a quick comparison of 15 leading Mettl competitors:
| Tool Name | Best For | Starting Price | Standout Features | Core Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Testlify | Enterprises requiring a large library of role-specific tests | $69/month | 3,500+ assessments, conversational AI interviews, advanced proctoring | Only a 7-day free trial is offered |
| iMocha | Organizations needing a huge skills assessment library with AI proctoring | $1,100/year | LogicBox AI assessments and 30,000+ skill coverage | Feature-heavy platform with a noticeable learning curve |
| HackerRank | Companies seeking a comprehensive coding test and interview solution | $165/month | Role-based coding assessments and AI-assisted IDE | Relatively expensive for small teams |
| HackerEarth | Recruiting teams needing coding assessments and technical interviews | $99/month | Large coding question bank and role-based skill tests | Many features are available only on higher-tier plans |
| Codility | Developer hiring teams requiring role-specific coding tests | $1,200/year | Structured evaluations with a VS-style coding environment | Annual contracts can be pricey and inflexible |
| TestDome | Teams seeking simple, pay-as-you-go skills assessments | Pay per candidate | Wide technical test library and collaborative coding IDE | No custom test builder on lower plans and limited analytics |
| Coderbyte | Tech recruiters at startups and SMBs needing unlimited assessments | $199/month | Unlimited candidates, coding IDE, and AI auto-grading | Subscription may be costly for very small teams |
| TalentMesh | HR teams seeking an all-in-one recruiting and assessment platform | Custom pricing | Integrated ATS with assessments and analytics | Newer platform with a limited track record |
| TalentLens | HR departments needing scientifically validated psychometric tests | Custom pricing | Research-backed behavioral and cognitive assessments | No technical assessments and a dated interface |
| Talentate | Enterprises requiring a broad assessment suite for hiring and development | Custom pricing | Wide range of psychometric and skills-based tests | No conversational AI interviews and limited pricing transparency |
| Skillmeter | SMBs looking for quick, affordable skills assessments | Custom pricing | Simple test creation and fast candidate evaluation | Lacks advanced analytics and AI-based proctoring |
| TalentLyft | Companies wanting an ATS with built-in screening assessments | $299/month | ATS with employer branding and basic assessments | Assessment content is limited and often relies on third parties |
| Testello | Organizations in the MENA region needing bilingual assessments | Custom pricing | Arabic and English test support with basic proctoring | Small user base and limited integrations |
| Testgrid | Enterprises seeking large-scale psychometric assessments | Custom pricing | Psychometric testing and workforce analytics | Pricing and features are geared mainly toward large enterprises |
| Hirevue | Large enterprises requiring video interviewing at scale | Enterprise pricing | On-demand video interviews and AI-driven insights | Extremely costly and best suited for high-volume hiring |
Now we will dive into each alternative in detail, covering key features, pros and cons, customer feedback, and pricing and G2 ratings, to help you determine which platform is best equipped to replace Mercer Mettl for your hiring needs.
1. Testlify

Testlify is a leading AI-powered skills assessment and interviewing platform that offers 3,500+ role-specific tests in 8+ languages, enabling organizations to identify top talent worldwide. The platform also includes over 20 advanced proctoring measures, such as AI-assistance detection and dual-camera proctoring to ensure assessment integrity.
This makes it an ideal solution for both startups and enterprises that are seeking a scalable and flexible platform to support global hiring needs.
Features
- Extensive test library: Over 3,500 pre-built tests covering technical, cognitive, and soft skills. Custom tests can also be created.
- Custom question formats: Supports 25+ question types ranging from standard MCQs and essay responses to innovative video AI and voice AI interviewing formats.
- Conversational AI interviews: Simulate on-the-job scenarios across chat, voice, and video formats to provide a realistic candidate experience.
- Psychometric assessments: Supports a wide range of psychometric tests that measure personality, behavior, and thinking style of candidates.
- AI insights: Generate concise summaries of candidates’ performance, highlighting strengths and areas for improvement.
- Extensive ATS integrations: Supports over 100 ATS integrations such as Zapier and Zoho Recruit to streamline recruitment workflows.
- Anti-cheating & proctoring: Features 18+ anti-cheating and proctoring measures such as dual-camera proctoring, AI assistance detection, live video proctoring, and more to ensure test integrity
Pros
- Wide and flexible test library covering cognitive, technical, soft skills, and role-based assessments
- Supports multilingual role-specific tests for more accurate and inclusive evaluation
- Custom tests can be created, offering flexibility to tailor assessments to specific job requirements.
- Speeds up hiring with conversational AI interviews and detailed analytics
- Robust proctoring features ensure test integrity
Cons
- The wide range of features may require some initial time to explore.
- Proctoring and analytics features require setup time but enhance security and evaluation accuracy.
What customers are saying
Testlify users consistently praise its modern AI capabilities and overall ease of use. Many highlight the intuitive, user-friendly interface that simplifies the experience for both administrators and candidates.
Customers value the extensive library of role-specific tests and the deep customization options, which allow them to tailor assessments precisely to the skill levels required for each position.
The platform’s AI interviews are also mentioned as a valuable feature for efficient initial screening, while the AI-driven scoring system helps hiring teams evaluate candidates with greater accuracy.

Testlify vs Mercer Mettl direct comparison
This comparison presents a detailed, side-by-side evaluation of Testlify and Mercer Mettl across essential product performance categories, offering a clear view of how each platform is rated by customers.

G2 Rating: 4.8/5 (500+ reviews)
Pricing: Starts at $69/month (Starter plan) with a free trial available. Other scalable plans are offered for growing businesses, and large enterprises can even avail the unlimited plan at $75,000/year. This plan includes unlimited candidate credits and full platform functionality, ideal for large enterprises with ongoing, high-volume hiring needs.
2. TalentLens

TalentLens is Pearson’s flagship suite of psychometric assessments for hiring and development. It’s rooted in decades of industrial-organizational psychology research, offering scientifically validated tests for assessing cognitive ability, personality, and other psychological traits of candidates.
Features
- Cognitive ability tests: TalentLens includes famous assessments like the Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal and various numerical and abstract reasoning tests.
- Personality and motivation questionnaires: TalentLens offers assessments to profile whether a candidate’s traits align with role requirements or company culture.
- Industry and role-specific norms: Since Pearson’s tests have been used so broadly, TalentLens can often provide normative data specific to certain industries or job levels.
- Scientific rigor and validity: All TalentLens assessments undergo strict development processes to ensure reliability and validity. They adhere to standards set by bodies like the British Psychological Society (BPS) and EFPA.
Pros
- Backed by decades of research, TalentLens assessments are widely trusted for their scientific validity and ability to predict job performance.
- Used across multiple talent use cases, including hiring, leadership development, team building, and identifying high-potential employees.
- Adds objective insights into how candidates think and behave, complementing skills or technical tests.
- Particularly valuable for leadership and management roles where critical thinking and cultural alignment matter.
- Supports global hiring with assessments available in multiple languages for fair and consistent evaluation.
Cons
- Focuses purely on psychometric assessments and does not offer technical or job specific skills tests.
- Cannot function as a standalone platform if coding or functional assessments are required.
- User interface feels dated compared to newer assessment platforms.
- Reports can be complex and often require trained professionals to interpret effectively.
- Pricing is typically high and not publicly transparent, which may be a barrier for smaller teams.
What customers are saying
Customers who use TalentLens praise its scientific foundation. They often specifically mention the Watson-Glaser test for critical thinking as a unique and incredibly useful tool. They also appreciate that the results are “rich and valid”, giving depth to their hiring decisions
On the downside, some users dislike that the platform’s UI is a bit dated and not super intuitive, which is echoed in G2 reviews
G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (9 reviews)
Pricing: Testgrid follows a custom pricing model, with quotes shared upon request..
3. The Talent Games

The Talent Games offers gamified assessments that help companies engage and evaluate candidates, especially during large-scale or campus hiring. Instead of traditional tests, it uses interactive games to measure aptitude, personality, and cultural fit.
Features
- Gamified assessments: Interactive games that measure aptitude, personality, culture-fit, and problem-solving skills.
- Situational Judgment Tests (SJTs): Realistic work scenarios to evaluate decision-making and behavioral tendencies.
- Role-specific tests: Custom assessments tailored to different job functions and industries.
- Employer branding tools: Gamified experiences that showcase a company’s culture and values.
- Data-driven insights: AI-generated reports that help hiring teams identify high-potential talent quickly.
Pros
- Offers an engaging approach to assess problem-solving, personality, and cultural fit.
- Provides situational judgment tests and immersive branded experiences for candidates.
- Uses AI analytics to identify top performers based on results derived from gamified assessments
- Ideal for campus recruiting, especially when candidate engagement is a priority.
Cons
- Premium pricing with custom quotes, often around five figures, which can be expensive for smaller teams.
- Not suitable for low-volume hiring or one-off assessments, as the pricing model is based on purchasing per game or license.
- Limited to game-based and situational judgment tests, so you may need another platform for skills testing, such as coding assessments.
What customers are saying
Users highlight that candidates “love the gamified experience,” and hiring teams find the data “fun and insightful.” Downsides include the steep cost and occasional tech hiccups. (Customer testimonials emphasize candidate engagement and predictive validity of the games.)
G2 Rating: 4.1/5 (5 reviews)
Pricing: Custom pricing based on volume and assessment type.
4. Codility

Codility is an online coding test & interview platform widely used by enterprises for assessing and validating the skills of tech talent. It provides a comprehensive platform for coding tests, tech interviews, and even training tests. Codility helps teams make evidence-based hiring decisions with features to reduce bias and save engineering time.
Features
- Extensive test library: Extensive library of 1100+ coding and technical tests in dozens of programming languages.
- Live technical interviews: Real-time coding interviews with a pair programming interface and code evaluation.
- Enterprise-grade features: Full anti-plagiarism suite, supports integrations with ATS, and provides detailed performance reports.
- Bias mitigation & analytics: By focusing on skill-based tasks and standardized scoring, Codility helps reduce unconscious bias in hiring. It provides analytics to compare candidates objectively.
Pros
- Comprehensive live coding environment (in-browser IDE, AI assistant).
- Extensive library of algorithmic and language-specific problems.
- Integrates with popular ATS (Greenhouse, iCIMS, etc.) and collaboration tools.
- Advanced features like plagiarism detection and AI “Copilot” help standardize grading.
Cons
- The entry price is high, with the Starter plan costing $1,200/year for just 120 invites.
- Learning curve for admins to set up questions and tests.
- Less emphasis on non-coding/soft-skill tests (focus is on developers).
What customers are saying
Codility gets high marks for its powerful coding tools. Users highlight the intuitive VS Code–style editor and “great variety” of problems, making interviews feel realistic.
On the downside, some note that as usage grows, the cost can become significant, and that certain integrations require extra configuration. A few also mention that the UI feels bloated, making even simple tasks like getting code to compile more cumbersome than necessary.
G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (861 reviews)
Pricing: Codility offers three structured pricing tiers: the Starter plan at $1,200 per year, the Scale plan at $6,000 per year, and a custom plan for large enterprises
5. Testgrid

Testgrid is an Australian-based assessment company that provides pre-employment tests and talent analytics, combining psychology with data science. It’s a well-established player in the APAC region (trusted by many large Australian organizations).
Testgrid’s offerings range from cognitive and psychometric tests to skills and safety assessments, plus it has some unique services like talent consulting and 360° surveys. Essentially, Testgrid is both a technology platform and a consulting service, positioned to deliver science-backed assessments for hiring and employee development.
Features
- Skills tests: They have commonly used skills tests for clerical abilities, data entry, typing speed, etc well as software skills like Microsoft Office tests.
- Safety and compliance assessments: Notably, Testgrid includes safety assessments and can integrate background checks or other verifications into the candidate screening process.
- Video interviewing & ATS integration: Under their technology solutions, they have a video interviewing platform and strong ATS integrations.
- Talent development tools: Beyond hiring, Testgrid offers tools for talent development and consulting, such as leadership development assessments, employee engagement surveys, and 360-degree feedback programs.
Pros
- Includes I/O psychologists and assessment experts who help teams choose the right tests and interpret results, making it well suited for enterprise hiring.
- Strong focus on scientifically validated assessments that are regularly updated and designed to reduce bias in screening.
- Australian owned with local data storage, which supports data sovereignty needs in regulated industries.
- Well aligned with the hiring norms and talent market across Australia and the broader APAC region.
- Offers multiple hiring tools in one platform, including cognitive tests, personality assessments, video interviews, and onboarding features.
Cons
- Enterprise-focused pricing is typically custom and can be expensive for small or mid-sized teams.
- Primarily centered on psychometric testing rather than hands on technical or coding assessments.
- Limited built in support for deep technical roles without relying on integrations or partners.
- Stronger regional focus in APAC, which may not suit organizations hiring heavily in other regions.
What customers are saying
Australian businesses often rely on Testgrid, with testimonials focusing on how it helps them make smarter hiring decisions and how it’s trusted by major organizations. Users likely appreciate the thoroughness of reports and the customer support.
Negative feedback might involve the learning curve for HR to interpret psychometric data or needing more training to use all features. Overall, customers depict Testgrid as a reliable, comprehensive partner for talent assessment rather than just a vendor.
G2 Rating: 4.7/5 (10 reviews)
Pricing: Testgrid follows a custom pricing model, with quotes shared upon request.
6. iMocha

iMocha is an AI-powered skills assessment platform that supports both pre-employment testing and workforce upskilling. iMocha has built a massive skills database and is known for its innovative Skills Intelligence features. Companies use iMocha to test candidates on a variety of skills ranging from coding and IT to finance, language, and more.
Features
- Large test library: Over 3000+ ready-to-use tests and 30,000+ skills mapped across industries.
- Custom test creation: Build your own tests from scratch or by combining existing questions present on the platform.
- Conversational interviews: Comes with an AI interviewer named Tara who engages in conversations with candidates and auto-generates a report that provides qualitative insights on the candidate’s strengths and areas of improvements.
- AI-powered analytics: Detailed performance reports with benchmarking against industry standards.
Pros
- Huge library (10,000+ skills, including coding, IT, business, and even soft skills).
- Includes AI-driven features (Resume Parser, Code Compare, Smart Test Generator).
- Advanced proctoring options (Live, Record & Review) and plagiarism checks.
- Robust analytics dashboards and integration with LMS/ATS.
Cons
- Even the Basic plan ($999/year for 100 attempts) is expensive for small teams.
- The interface and feature set can feel overwhelming at first (there’s a learning curve).
- No pure pay-per-use option (must commit to an annual seat-based plan).
What customers are saying
Reviewers rate iMocha highly for its rich feature set. One user calls it “very easy to use” with an “extensive array of features” that streamlined their hiring. Another praises the quality of the question library and the time saved.
Users appreciate the dedicated customer success team and frequent updates. On the other hand, some note minor quibbles like wanting more question types (one review wished for additional variety) and the initial setup being somewhat steep.
But overall, iMocha is seen as feature-rich and reliable.
G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (276 reviews)
Pricing: 14-day free trial available. Plans start at $1100/year (basic plan) and scale up for larger teams.
7. Hirevue

Hirevue is a pioneer in the digital interviewing space that has expanded into assessments. It offers a video interviewing platform combined with game-based and AI-driven assessments. It is used globally by enterprises to streamline high-volume hiring with on-demand video interviews, coding challenges, and even AI-scored games that measure cognitive ability and personality.
Features
- IO Science content library: Access to validated role specific interview content.
- Video interviews (On-demand & live): One-way and live video interviews with scoring rubrics. AI is used to capture non-verbal cues and evaluates the verbal response content and tone.
- Game-based assessments: AI-driven cognitive games that measure problem-solving, communication, and coding skills.
- Scheduling and Automation: Auto-schedules interviews, engages candidates via chatbots, and integrates with your ATS.
Pros
- Offers verbal and nonverbal analytics for interviews.
- Comprehensive solution – supports on-demand video interviews, live interviews, coding challenges, and game-based assessments.
- Strong focus on diversity and bias reduction (AI Explainability framework, standardized scoring).
- Integrates with many HR systems; includes consulting support.
Cons
- Complexity: setup and change management can be significant for new customers.
- Customer reviews mention occasional glitches in scheduling and technical issues during live interviews.
What customers are saying
Hirevue users appreciate its ability to scale hiring processes. Reviews highlight the ease of use for scheduling and conducting interviews, noting it’s a “time-saver” since candidates have the option to self-record responses.
On the downside, users do report issues like scheduling limitations (e.g., lack of buffer times, no rescheduling feature) and rare outages
G2 Rating: 4.1/5 (253 reviews)
Pricing: Hirevue offers three plan tiers, but pricing is not publicly disclosed and requires users to get in touch with the Hirevue team for more details.
8. TestDome

TestDome is a skills testing platform focused on work-sample assessments. It provides over 150 pre-made tests across various domains from programming and IT to accounting, customer service, and more. TestDome’s philosophy is to test applicants with tasks that closely mirror actual job work.
Features
- Work-sample tests: Real-world tasks (e.g., coding, data entry, customer service scenarios).
- Library of 150+ pre-built tests: Covers roles across software development, accounting, customer service, data entry, and more. Tests are short, effective, and designed to filter out unqualified applicants quickly.
- Anticheating & proctoring measures: Includes basic proctoring measures such as webcam monitoring and screen recording to deter and detect cheating.
- Benchmarking analytics: Provides side-by-side comparisons of candidates based on test scores.
Pros
- Pay-as-you-go pricing (buy test credits as needed).
- Extensive library of coding, IT, and workplace skills tests (developer, QA, data science, office skills, etc.).
- Easy online setup: turn-key tests plus basic proctoring (timers, webcam).
- Suitable for one-off or irregular hiring.
Cons
- Focuses mostly on English-language tests (no built-in localization).
- The non-technical or soft-skill test library is relatively limited.
- No free plan (the lowest tier is a 5-candidate pack at $100).
What customers are saying
Users find TestDome “very easy to use” with a clean interface. One reviewer noted it makes their recruitment process smoother and more flexible due to features like automated reminders and flexible deadlines. The ability to pay only for what you use is also praised by teams enaging in sporadic hiring.
Common complaints include wishing for more languages (e.g., French) and wanting a few more multiple-choice question options. But overall, TestDome’s simplicity and straightforward pricing are strong positives.
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (139 reviews)
Pricing: Pay-per-candidate model. For example, $100 for 5 candidates.
9. Coderbyte

Coderbyte is a technical assessment platform geared towards startups and mid-sized firms for hiring developers and data scientists. It enables unlimited coding tests, technical screening challenges, and even take-home projects on a subscription basis.
Features
- Coding challenges & projects: Massive library of 1,000+ coding challenges, 30+ languages, & 100+ skills.
- Multiple question types: Includes multiple-choice questions, open-ended responses, and SQL queries.
- Built-in interviewing tools: Supports live video coding interviews with collaborative tools including a real-time code editor, spreadsheets, Jupyter Notebooks, and a virtual whiteboard.
- Reporting and analytics: Coderbyte offers a comprehensive reporting and analytics for each coding assessment, which includes several key components such as the candidate’s code, code video recordings, skill ratings and internal benchmarking charts.
Pros
- Straightforward monthly plans ($199/month for the standard plan).
- Built-in code editor and a large library of coding challenges.
- Easy test creation (mix your own questions with templates) and clear candidate reports.
- Facilitates one-on-one live coding interviews through the platform.
Cons
- Exporting results (JSON/CSV) requires a higher-tier plan (extra cost).
- Lacks advanced enterprise features (focus is on coding tasks only).
What customers are saying
Reviewers note that Coderbyte is “much less expensive than alternatives” while providing basic needed functionality. Many appreciate the ease of setup; one said it’s “super easy to configure the assessments” for candidates.
On the downside, one user warned that you can only invite 50 candidates per plan (unexpected until hit), and another mentioned it can be frustrating to pay extra for exporting results. In sum, users like the simplicity and cost-effectiveness, but be mindful of plan limits.
G2 Rating: 4.4/5 (356 reviews)
Pricing: $199/month (unlimited candidates and tests). Annual plans are available at a discount.
10. Testello

Testello is a testing solutions provider that has a particular focus on the Middle East (the platform is UK-based but designed for MENA region needs). It offers pre-employment tests in areas like language (including Arabic), cognitive ability (IQ), emotional intelligence (EQ), and other job-related skills.
Think of it as an assessment platform tailored for bilingual testing (English/Arabic) and local market requirements. It can be used by companies and educational institutions alike for hiring, promotions, or training needs.
Features
- Language and aptitude tests: Testello provides English and Arabic language proficiency tests useful for employers in bilingual environments.
- Personality assessments: The platform includes EQ tests and possibly personality profiling tools. This helps evaluate soft skills and interpersonal traits, which is valuable in many hiring contexts.
- Custom test development: A standout feature is that you can develop your own tests with custom questions and scoring logic on Testello.
- Secure and localized: Testello emphasizes secure testing and probably aligns with local norms (e.g., culturally relevant test content, RTL support for Arabic, etc.).
- Analytics and Insights: As with most such platforms, you get score reports and possibly some benchmarking.
Pros
- Strong bilingual testing support in Arabic and English, including proper right to left interfaces, which many global platforms lack.
- Well suited for employers in the Middle East, with content and workflows designed around regional hiring needs.
- Allows teams to build fully custom tests using their own questions and job specific content.
- Designed for high stakes use cases such as hiring, promotions, and training, with security measures to protect test integrity.
- A good option for organizations that need a regional alternative to global assessment platforms.
Cons
- Limited global track record compared to well known international assessment providers.
- Test libraries are more focused on IQ, EQ, and language skills than deep technical or coding assessments.
- Advanced programming or role specific technical tests may be limited or require external tools.
- Platform usability and user experience are less proven at scale compared to mature global SaaS products.
- Scalability for very large hiring volumes may need validation for enterprise level use.
What customers are saying
Public reviews for the platform are limited, but it is reasonable to expect that organizations in the Middle East value having a local partner that understands regional hiring needs and designs assessments to match them.
G2 Rating: N/A
Pricing: Testello does not disclose its pricing publicly. Recruiters need to get in touch with the sales team to get a custom quote
11. HackerEarth

HackerEarth is an AI-driven tech hiring platform that provides robust tools for screening developers. It supports standardized coding assessments, hackathons, and even remote interviews. Known for its advanced proctoring capabilities and variety of coding challenges, HackerEarth is used by enterprises to identify top tech talent at scale.
Features
- Comprehensive Test Library: Choose from a library of 25,000+ questions across 15+ question types, including multiple choice, project-based, and data science questions.
- Advanced Proctoring: Features like AI powered webcam monitoring and plagiarism detection ensure the integrity of assessments.
- Real-Time Interviews (FaceCode): Intelligent live coding interview tool that comes with a collaborative code editor, a built-in question library, HD video chat and a whiteboard.
- Analytics & Skill Reports: Provides detailed skill-based performance reports and AI powered summaries that highlights technical performance and behavioral insights of candidates interviewed.
Pros
- Massive question library (many use HackerEarth’s library of thousands of coding problems).
- Unique features such as FaceCode AI video interview (candidates code live on camera).
- Supports conducting virtual hackathons and competitions.
- Real-time proctoring (IP-based, webcam monitoring) and plagiarism checks.
Cons
- Rigid time limits on tests can be frustrating
- Enterprise-focused pricing means small teams may still pay for surplus features.
What customers are saying
G2 users rate HackerEarth highly for its versatile coding platform. Reviews highlight the ease of creating coding assessments and the support for multiple languages.
However, users express concerns about the strict timers that affect candidate experience (e.g., “time limits can be restrictive for solving complex coding problems”) and occasional minor bugs in test creation.
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (900 reviews)
Pricing: HackerEarth offers scalable pricing plans designed to grow with your business. Pricing plans start at $99 per month, with higher-tier plans available to support larger teams and advanced hiring needs
12. HackerRank

HackerRank is an enterprise-grade developer assessment platform and coding challenge hub that has been on the market for over a decade. It enables companies to create skill-based technical assessments to screen candidates effectively.
Features
- Extensive question bank: HackerRank’s test library is specialized for technical hiring offers a library, featuring over 7500 questions which is mostly comprised of coding challenges across 40+ programming languages.
- Screen, interview, and beyond: Coding tests, live pair programming, and interview tools.
- Fair scoring: Leverages multiple proctoring and user signals to ensure each developer has an equal opportunity to demonstrate their skills, while maintaining the integrity of the assessment.
- Enterprise integrations: Supports integrations with ATS and other recruitment tools.
Pros
- Extensive problem library (algorithmic, database, functional, domain-specific).
- Flexible “Skill Assess” and “Interview” modules for coding tests and live interviews.
- Strong anti-cheating measures (screen monitoring, plagiarism check).
- Integrates with many ATS/IDEs; well-supported with enterprise SLA.
Cons
- It can be expensive (the Starter plan is $165/month, and growth can become costly).
- Known to have a steeper learning curve for advanced use (writing tests often require multiple iterations).
- Some users feel pricing and “attempt” models favor large-volume hiring.
What customers are saying
Many companies trust HackerRank for its proven track record in tech hiring. (It’s so common that many developers have used it themselves.) Users often mention the sheer breadth of questions as a strength. However, consistent feedback is that building custom questions is time-consuming and that pricing is high for small teams.
G2 reviews also frequently mention its utility in consistent developer screening, but also note that alternatives can be cheaper or simpler to use.
G2 Rating: 4.6/5 (990 reviews)
Pricing: Flexible usage-based pricing. Plans start at $165/month for the Starter plan.
13. Skillmeter

Skillmeter is a cloud-based skills testing platform built with simplicity in mind. It enables recruiters to easily create custom tests using their own questions or select from a small set of ready-made ones, then share them with candidates and quickly review results in one place.
Skillmeter covers a variety of domains (IT, general aptitude, clerical skills, etc.) but is especially popular for organizations that want to create their own quizzes easily. It’s much smaller and lighter-weight compared to others on this list, making it a good fit for small and mid-sized businesses.
Features
- Custom test creation: Provides a highly flexible test builder with a wide variety of custom question types making it ideal for organizations seeking granular control and flexibility in test creation.
- Talent assessment library: While it emphasizes custom questions, Skillmeter does have a library of pre-written questions across common topics (especially for IT, math, language, etc.) and you can pick from these to assemble a test.
- Test scheduling: You can send test invites to candidates via email through the platform. Tests can be timed, and you can set whether questions are shown in random order, etc. Once candidates complete tests, Skillmeter automatically scores them (for objective question types) and provides results in a dashboard.
- Candidate Dashboard and Reports: The platform provides a clear, easy-to-read report for each candidate, showing overall scores, correct and incorrect answers, and responses to questions that require manual review.
Pros
- Very easy to use, even for non technical users, with a clean and intuitive interface for creating and managing tests.
- Supports custom question creation, allowing teams to test niche skills, internal knowledge, or role specific requirements.
- Transparent and affordable pricing with flexible monthly plans, making it cost effective for small and growing teams.
- Offers tiered plans that scale with hiring needs, including options for programming tests at higher levels.
- Includes API access, which helps teams integrate assessments into existing hiring workflows.
Cons
- Lacks advanced features such as AI proctoring, webcam monitoring, or deep cheating detection.
- Analytics and reporting are basic and mainly limited to scores and rankings.
- Smaller pre-built question library compared to larger assessment platforms.
- Candidate interface is functional but basic, with no gamified or highly interactive experience.
- Does not offer built in video interviews or live coding sessions, requiring additional tools for those needs.
What customers are saying
Skillmeter tends to fly under the radar, so detailed public reviews are few, but one impartial review noted it’s “quick, simple, and intuitive”. Users in that review highlighted that it covers the basics well: test creation, candidate administration, and result tracking
However some users mention that they would like a larger library of ready-made tests and more detailed reporting features. Overall, customers describe Skillmeter as a simple but effective tool for filtering out unqualified candidates early in the hiring process, particularly for entry and mid level roles.
G2 Rating: N/A
Pricing: Starts at $59/month (standard plan). Pricing increases for more features.
14. eSkill

eSkill is a long-established pre-employment testing platform known for its huge variety of skills tests. It offers both ready-made and custom assessments covering clerical skills, software proficiency, literacy and math, accounting, legal, call center scenarios, you name it.
Features
- Massive test library: Choose from over 600 ready-to-use assessments or create custom tests by selecting subjects, topics, and questions tailored to your job or training needs.
- Simulations: Go beyond multiple-choice questions with eSkill’s interactive job simulation tests that evaluate how candidates perform in real-world job scenarios.
- Anti-cheating and advanced proctoring: Enables organizations maintain the integrity of assessments by monitoring behaviors such as copy-pasting and tab switching, automatically flagging any suspicious activity in real time.
- Reporting and analytics: Access detailed candidate reports, including overall scores and performance breakdowns by subject or question, allowing you to gain insights into each applicant’s strengths and weaknesses.
Pros
- Vast library spanning technical, cognitive, safety, and even software simulation tests.
- Easily mix-and-match questions to build custom assessments.
- Strong analytics and score reports (skill-gap charts, detailed breakdowns).
- Good integrations (Greenhouse, iCIMS, etc.), and multilingual support.
Cons
- Interface can be clunky: some users say it’s hard to find specific questions without searching around
- Fewer pre-built job-specific tests than promised (reviewers sometimes have to build exams from scratch).
What customers are saying
Users emphasize eSkill’s flexibility and breadth. For example, one recruiter says it lets them “find the most useful questions for each department” by customizing tests.
However, some users point out that navigating the test library can be tedious and that they would like more ready-made assessment templates to save time. A few users found the pricing to be expensive for low-volume hiring.
In general, though, eSkill’s customer support and reporting tools are well regarded.
G2 Rating: 4.5/5 (341 reviews)
Pricing: eSkill does not disclose its pricing publicly. Recruiters need to get in touch with the sales team to get a custom quote
15. Talentate

Talentate is an online assessment platform that offers a variety of assessment types, from language and coding tests to personality questionnaires and even virtual case studies.
Features
- Online assessment center: The system is designed to allow multiple assessments to be combined and administered to a batch of candidates and then provide a consolidated view of their performance
- Custom projects and work simulations: Talentate supports custom projects and lets teams design project-based assessments where candidates complete practical tasks over a set period of time directly within the platform.
- Integrations and API: It offers integration capabilities (and an API) so that it can be tied into your ATS or HRIS. This ensures you can import candidate data and export results without manual work.
Pros
- Covers cognitive, technical, and behavioral assessments in a single platform, making it ideal for full assessment centers and complex hiring programs.
- Supports job simulations and project-based exercises, helping employers evaluate candidates in real-world scenarios.
- Reduces administrative work by replacing multiple tools with one end to end assessment workflow.
- Centralizes all candidate results in one place, making comparisons and decision making easier for HR teams.
- Provides a well-rounded candidate profile by combining aptitude, technical skills, and behavioral data.
Cons
- Less well known globally compared to established assessment brands, which may require additional internal buy-in.
- Can be more than needed for simple hiring use cases that only require one type of assessment.
- Interface is functional but may feel less polished than larger, more mature platforms.
- A smaller user base means fewer public reviews and community resources.
- Requires strong onboarding and support to fully use advanced features like simulations and case-based assessments.
What customers are saying
There are currently no publicly available online reviews for Talentate, which can make it harder for buyers to assess real-world user experiences before adopting the platform.
G2 Rating: N/A
Pricing: The cheapest plan starts at $18/month for 5 candidates.
Which is the best Mercer Mettl alternative?
After evaluating all the alternatives, Testlify emerges as the strongest Mercer Mettl alternative for most organizations. It directly addresses Mettl’s key limitations while offering a broader and more modern assessment experience.
Testlify features an extensive test library (over 3,500+ role-specific tests), psychometric assessments and conversational AI interviews for creating realistic job simulations at scale. It also supports 100+ ATS integrations out of the box.
Whether you’re looking for pre-employment testing tools or a conversational AI powered interview platform for high volume hiring, Testlify excels at delivering everything you need without overwhelming your budget.
Read our in-depth Testlify vs Mercer Mettl comparison article to make the best choice for your hiring needs.

Chatgpt
Perplexity
Gemini
Grok
Claude




















